scholarly journals Bound state and localization of excitation in many-body open systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. T. Cui ◽  
H. Z. Shen ◽  
S. C. Hou ◽  
X. X. Yi
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Macieszczak ◽  
Emanuele Levi ◽  
Tommaso Macrì ◽  
Igor Lesanovsky ◽  
Juan P. Garrahan
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 316 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fabre de la Ripelle ◽  
S.A. Sofianos ◽  
R.M. Adam

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond F. Bishop ◽  
Miloslav Znojil

The quantum many-body bound-state problem in its computationally successful coupled cluster method (CCM) representation is reconsidered. In conventional practice one factorizes the groundstate wave functions |Ψ) = e<sup>S</sup> |Φ) which live in the “physical” Hilbert space H<sup>(P)</sup> using an elementary ansatz for |Φi plus a formal expansion of S in an operator basis of multi-configurational creation operators C<sup>+</sup>. In our paper a reinterpretation of the method is proposed. Using parallels between the CCM and the so called quasi-Hermitian, <em>alias</em> three-Hilbert-space (THS), quantum mechanics, the CCM transition from the known microscopic Hamiltonian (denoted by usual symbol <em>H</em>), which is self-adjoint in <em>H<sup>(P)</sup></em>, to its effective lower-case isospectral avatar <em>h = e<sup>−S</sup>He<sup>S</sup></em>, is assigned a THS interpretation. In the opposite direction, a THS-prescribed, non-CCM, innovative reinstallation of Hermiticity is shown to be possible for the CCM effective Hamiltonian <em>h</em>, which only appears manifestly non-Hermitian in its own (“friendly”) Hilbert space <em>H<sup>(F)</sup></em>. This goal is achieved via an ad hoc amendment of the inner product in <em>H<sup>(F)</sup></em>, thereby yielding the third (“standard”) Hilbert space <em>H<sup>(S)</sup></em>. Due to the resulting exact unitary equivalence between the first and third spaces, <em>H<sup>(F)</sup></em> ∼ <em>H<sup>(S)</sup></em>, the indistinguishability of predictions calculated in these alternative physical frameworks is guaranteed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 122 (14) ◽  
pp. 144319 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Baccarelli ◽  
F. A. Gianturco ◽  
T. González-Lezana ◽  
G. Delgado-Barrio ◽  
S. Miret-Artés ◽  
...  

1973 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhagat S. Yarlagadda ◽  
György Csanak ◽  
Howard S. Taylor ◽  
Barry Schneider ◽  
Robert Yaris

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1014
Author(s):  
Romain N. Soguel ◽  
Andrey V. Volotka ◽  
Dmitry A. Glazov ◽  
Stephan Fritzsche

The redefined vacuum approach, which is frequently employed in the many-body perturbation theory, proved to be a powerful tool for formula derivation. Here, we elaborate this approach within the bound-state QED perturbation theory. In addition to general formulation, we consider the particular example of a single particle (electron or vacancy) excitation with respect to the redefined vacuum. Starting with simple one-electron QED diagrams, we deduce first- and second-order many-electron contributions: screened self-energy, screened vacuum polarization, one-photon exchange, and two-photon exchange. The redefined vacuum approach provides a straightforward and streamlined derivation and facilitates its application to any electronic configuration. Moreover, based on the gauge invariance of the one-electron diagrams, we can identify various gauge-invariant subsets within derived many-electron QED contributions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document