Magnetic-field inversion symmetry in quantum pumps with discrete symmetries under the Floquet formalism

2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Wook Kim
1990 ◽  
Vol 165-166 ◽  
pp. 1103-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.M. Grishin ◽  
A.Yu. Martynovich ◽  
S.V. Yampolskii

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
B. Vital Leonardo ◽  
Foss Clive ◽  
C. Oliveira Vanderlei ◽  
C. F. Barbosa Valeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Krešić ◽  
G. R. M. Robb ◽  
G. Labeyrie ◽  
R. Kaiser ◽  
T. Ackemann

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-131
Author(s):  
O.O. Tsareva ◽  
V.Yu. Popov ◽  
H.V. Malova ◽  
E.P. Popova ◽  
M.V. Podzolko ◽  
...  

Recent observations, such as the magnetic field strength decrease, a magnetic poles shifts and the South Atlantic anomaly increase, may indicate the beginning of the Earth’s magnetic field inversion. According to the geomagnetic dynamo model, the dipole component of the magnetic field is zeroed at the inversion time, and the quadrupole one becomes dominant. To assess the occurrence of radiation hazards on the Earth’s surface and in near-Earth space at the time of magnetic field inversion, a numerical model was developed that made it possible to compare the GCR and SCR fluxes (at minima and maxima of solar activity) penetrating the Earth (taking into account the atmosphere) and the ISS in periods of the dipole and quadrupole fields dominance. It was found that during the period of inversion the flow of GCR (high-energy particles) can increase no more than three times over the entire surface of the Earth and the radiation dose will not exceed permissible one for man. Also, a change of the magnetic field configuration will redistribute areas of increased radiation on the Earth’s surface (today these are the poles of the Earth), which can adversely affect people’s health in these areas.


2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 423-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tomek ◽  
A. Platil

1997 ◽  
Vol 56 (21) ◽  
pp. 14143-14148
Author(s):  
Stavros Theodorakis ◽  
Epameinondas Leontidis

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 282-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.S. Ipson ◽  
V.V. Zharkova ◽  
S. Zharkov ◽  
A.K. Benkhalil ◽  
J. Aboudarham ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (31) ◽  
pp. 1844016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zurab Berezhiani ◽  
Arkady Vainshtein

We analyze status of [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] discrete symmetries in application to neutron–antineutron transitions breaking conservation of baryon charge [Formula: see text] by two units. At the level of free particles, all these symmetries are preserved. This includes [Formula: see text] reflection in spite of the opposite internal parities usually ascribed to neutron and antineutron. Explanation, which goes back to the 1937 papers by Majorana and Racah, is based on a definition of parity satisfying [Formula: see text], instead of [Formula: see text], and ascribing [Formula: see text] to both, neutron and antineutron. We apply this to [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] classification of six-quark operators with [Formula: see text]. It allows to specify operators contributing to neutron–antineutron oscillations. Remaining operators contribute to other [Formula: see text] processes and, in particular, to nuclei instability. We also show that presence of external magnetic field does not induce any new operator mixing the neutron and antineutron provided that rotational invariance is not broken.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document