scholarly journals Localization behavior at bound Bi complex states in GaAs1−xBix

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Alberi ◽  
T. M. Christian ◽  
B. Fluegel ◽  
S. A. Crooker ◽  
D. A. Beaton ◽  
...  
Nanophotonics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 443-452
Author(s):  
Tianshu Jiang ◽  
Anan Fang ◽  
Zhao-Qing Zhang ◽  
Che Ting Chan

AbstractIt has been shown recently that the backscattering of wave propagation in one-dimensional disordered media can be entirely suppressed for normal incidence by adding sample-specific gain and loss components to the medium. Here, we study the Anderson localization behaviors of electromagnetic waves in such gain-loss balanced random non-Hermitian systems when the waves are obliquely incident on the random media. We also study the case of normal incidence when the sample-specific gain-loss profile is slightly altered so that the Anderson localization occurs. Our results show that the Anderson localization in the non-Hermitian system behaves differently from random Hermitian systems in which the backscattering is suppressed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2099 (1) ◽  
pp. 012027
Author(s):  
I V Bychkov ◽  
A A Tolstikhin ◽  
S A Ulyanov

Abstract We propose a new lobster-inspired chemotaxis decentralized control strategy for monitoring a non-stationary concentration field using a team of nonholonomic mobile robots. The task of the team is to locate and trace the movement of the point (or points) with the highest field value (i.e. source), provided that the robots are not aware of the dynamics of the field and can only periodically sample the field at their locations. As an example of the concentration field we consider a population of biological species modeled by a self-organizing multi-agent system with agents acting as individuals of the population in accordance with some flocking rules. The proposed strategy combines the lobsters’ plume localization behavior and flocking mechanisms to efficiently solve the problem even with a small group of robots. Simulations and experimental works on physical unicycle robots are performed to validate the efectiveness of the approach for the cases of non-stationary fields.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 207-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Coleman N. Alleman ◽  
James W. Foulk ◽  
Alejandro Mota ◽  
Hojun Lim ◽  
David J. Littlewood

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1542-1548.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Esquivelzeta Rabell ◽  
Kadir Mutlu ◽  
João Noutel ◽  
Pamela Martin del Olmo ◽  
Sebastian Haesler

2021 ◽  
pp. 455-464
Author(s):  
Tianshu Jiang ◽  
Anan Fang ◽  
Zhao-Qing Zhang ◽  
Che Ting Chan

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 934-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Vaadia ◽  
D. A. Benson ◽  
R. D. Hienz ◽  
M. H. Goldstein

The influence of sound localization behavior on unit activity in the frontal cortex of awake rhesus monkeys was examined by comparing responses under three behavioral conditions: auditory localization, during which a response was required to the location of a sound (broad-band noise) source; auditory detect, during which a response was required to indicate the occurrence of the sound regardless of location; visual localization, during which no sounds were presented and a response was required to the location of a visual stimulus; and nonperform, presentation of auditory stimuli as in the first two conditions, but with the animal sitting passively. Extracellular microelectrode recordings were made in the periarcuate region and dorsal and ventral prefrontal areas near the principal sulcus. Four monkeys were used with a total of 498 cells studied. Of the total population, only five cells were found to have characteristics similar to those of auditory units in the primary auditory cortex and the surrounding belt area. More typically, units were found that had strong short-latency responses specific to the auditory and/or visual localization tasks. These units had no or weak responses when the same sound stimuli were presented in the auditory detect task or when a monkey received the sound stimuli in a nonperforming condition. Two regions were identified, one medial and/or posterior to the arcuate sulcus, in Brodmann's area 6; the second included parts of areas 8 and 9 within the genu of the arcuate sulcus. Units from these regions are referred to, respectively, as the postarcuate and the prearcuate populations. Both populations responded predominantly during active localization behavior. Sixty-two percent of the postarcuate population responded during auditory localization, 32% responded during auditory detect, and only 18% responded to acoustic stimuli presented in the nonperforming condition. In the prearcuate population percentages in these three conditions were 35, 25, and 12%, respectively. For visual localization, 54% in the postarcuate population responded, whereas 42% in the prearcuate responded. Spatial tuning of units during auditory localization was similar to that seen in units of the primary auditory cortex, with the greatest percentages of units responding to stimuli contralateral to the recording site. Similar tuning was observed for the visual localization task as well. Similarities in spatial tuning between the auditory and visual localization conditions were examined to assess the "bimodal" nature of the units.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document