Intermolecular Force-Field Parameters for Boron Hydrides

1998 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Williams ◽  
D. Gao

Intermolecular atom–atom force-field parameters of the (exp-6-1) type for B and H atoms in boron hydrides were determined. They were obtained by full-weighted least-squares minimization of 116 forces in 15 observed crystal structures of boranes, the heat of sublimation of B10H14 and data from ab initio wavefunction calculations for diborane. Net atomic charges were obtained by fitting them to molecular electric potentials calculated from ab initio wavefunctions. Charges of terminal hydrogens were usually negative and those of bridging hydrogens usually positive. Repulsion-energy calculations for the B2H6 dimer provided the exponential dependence of H...H repulsion. Using the resulting force field, minimum-energy crystal structures were found with structural parameter values close to those of the observed structures. For diborane, energy minimization beginning with randomly oriented molecules placed initially in an 8 × 8 × 8 body-centered orthogonal cell led to the observed crystal structure and monoclinic space group.

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ugo Cosentino ◽  
Giorgio Moro ◽  
Demetrio Pitea ◽  
Mercedes Procopio ◽  
Pier Carlo Fantucci

1994 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 101-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Grassi ◽  
Giuseppe M. Lombardo ◽  
Giuseppe C. Pappalardo

2017 ◽  
Vol 121 (33) ◽  
pp. 7761-7770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiedong Sun ◽  
Alexander Mirzoev ◽  
Nikolay Korolev ◽  
Alexander P. Lyubartsev ◽  
Lars Nordenskiöld

1994 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 101-110
Author(s):  
Antonio Grassi ◽  
Giuseppe M. Lombardo ◽  
Giuseppe C. Pappalardo

2007 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey V. Dorokhov ◽  
Dmitrii Yu. Chernyshov ◽  
Anatolii S. Burlov ◽  
Alexandr D. Garnovskii ◽  
Irina S. Ivanova ◽  
...  

The crystal structures of two compounds, CuL 2 and LiNCS·HL [HL = 4′-[2-(tosylamino)benzylideneamino]-2,3-benzo-15-crown-5], have been determined from synchrotron powder diffraction data. Both compounds crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2 1/c and with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. In CuL 2 the four N atoms of two bidentate L ligands coordinate the CuII ion in a distorted tetrahedral geometry with Cu—N distances of 1.98 (5)–2.05 (5) Å, while two O atoms from two sulfoxide groups complete the distorted octahedral Cu coordination [Cu—O 2.64 (4), 2.74 (4) Å]. In LiNCS·HL, lithium is coordinated by all five ether O atoms with Li—O distances of 2.03 (3)–2.50 (3) Å and an N atom from the thiocyanate moiety [Li—N 1.98 (3) Å] in a distorted pentagonal pyramidal geometry. Preliminary potentiometric selectivity measurements for ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) based on CuL 2 and ZnL 2 demonstrated significant differences in their selectivity. In order to find a possible reason for this, theoretical calculations at the DFT (B3LYP) level were performed. These calculations used the crystal structures of CuL 2, LiNCS·HL, ZnL 2 and HL as input geometries for the minimum energy optimization in vacuo. The results indicate that in ML 2 complexes (M = Cu, Zn) the electronic structure of the metal ion determines the spatial orientation of benzo-15-crown-5 macrocycles, and their different orientation in CuL 2 and ZnL 2 results in different potentiometric selectivities of ISEs based on these compounds.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 4492-4503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Frank C. Pickard ◽  
Badri Narayanan ◽  
Fatih G. Sen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document