scholarly journals Different packing motifs mediated by weak interactions and polymorphism in the crystal structures of five 2-(benzylidene)benzosuberone derivatives

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1741-1747
Author(s):  
Lewis S. Seaman ◽  
Cristiane F. da Costa ◽  
Marcus V. N. de Souza ◽  
Solange M. S. V. Wardell ◽  
James L. Wardell ◽  
...  

The syntheses and crystal structures of five 2-benzylidene-1-benzosuberone [1-benzosuberone is 6,7,8,9-tetrahydro-5H-benzo[7]annulen-5-one] derivatives, viz. 2-(4-methoxybenzylidene)-1-benzosuberone, C19H18O2, (I), 2-(4-ethoxybenzylidene)-1-benzosuberone, C20H20O2, (II), 2-(4-benzylbenzylidene)-1-benzosuberone, C25H22O2, (III), 2-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-1-benzosuberone, C18H15ClO, (IV) and 2-(4-cyanobenzylidene)-1-benzosuberone, C19H15NO, (V), are described. The conformations of the benzosuberone fused six- plus seven-membered ring fragments are very similar in each case, but the dihedral angles between the fused benzene ring and the pendant benzene ring differ somewhat, with values of 23.79 (3) for (I), 24.60 (4) for (II), 33.72 (4) for (III), 29.93 (8) for (IV) and 21.81 (7)° for (V). Key features of the packing include pairwise C—H...O hydrogen bonds for (II) and (IV), and pairwise C—H...N hydrogen bonds for (V), which generate inversion dimers in each case. The packing for (I) and (III) feature C—H...O hydrogen bonds, which lead to [010] and [100] chains, respectively. Weak C—H...π interactions consolidate the structures and weak aromatic π–π stacking is seen in (II) [centroid–centroid separation = 3.8414 (7) Å] and (III) [3.9475 (7) Å]. A polymorph of (I) crystallized from a different solvent has been reported previously [Dimmock et al. (1999) J. Med. Chem. 42, 1358–1366] in the same space group but with a packing motif based on inversion dimers resembling that seen in (IV) in the present study. The Hirshfeld surfaces and fingerprint plots for (I) and its polymorph are compared and structural features of the 2-benzylidene-1-benzosuberone family of phases are surveyed.

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (6) ◽  
pp. o679-o679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakima Chicha ◽  
El Mostapha Rakib ◽  
Abdellah Hannioui ◽  
Mohamed Saadi ◽  
Lahcen El Ammari

The indazole ring system of the title compound, C17H18ClN3O4S, is almost planar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0113 Å) and forms dihedral angles of 32.22 (8) and 57.5 (3)° with the benzene ring and the mean plane through the 4-ethoxy group, respectively. In the crystal, molecules are connected by pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds into inversion dimers, which are further linked by π–π interactions between the diazole rings [intercentroid distance = 3.4946 (11) Å], forming chains parallel to [101].


Author(s):  
Ying Liang ◽  
Li-Qiao Shi ◽  
Zi-Wen Yang

In the title compound, C19H13ClF2N2O2, the conformation of the N—H bond in the amide segment isantito the C=O bond. The molecule is not planar, with dihedral angles between the central benzene ring and the outer benzene and pyridyl rings of 73.35 (7) and 81.26 (6)°, respectively. A weak intramolecular C—H...O hydrogen bond occurs. In the crystal, N—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...F hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of dimers. The N—H...N inversion dimers are linked by π–π contacts between adjacent pyridine rings [centroid–centroid = 3.8541 (12) Å] and C—H...π interactions. These contacts combine to stack the molecules along theaaxis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. o2485-o2485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asifa Nigar ◽  
Zareen Akhter ◽  
M. Nawaz Tahir

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C14H12N2O4, contains two molecules that differ principally in the orientation of the acetamide substituent to the adjacent benzene ring with dihedral angles of 44.77 (7) and 19.06 (7)°. The dihedral angles between the benzene rings are 64.46 (4) and 80.84 (4)°. In the crystal, classical N—H...O hydrogen bonds formC(4) chains along [100]. These chains are interlinked by C—H...O contacts formingR22(10) rings. In the crystal, π–π interactions are observed with a distance of 3.5976 (18) Å between the centroids of the nitro-substituted benzene rings of one type of molecule.


Author(s):  
Ligia R. Gomes ◽  
John Nicolson Low ◽  
Carlos Fernandes ◽  
Alexandra Gaspar ◽  
Fernanda Borges

The crystal structures of two chromone derivatives,viz.ethyl 6-(4-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxylate, C19H16O4, (1), and ethyl 6-(4-fluorophenyl)-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxylate C18H13FO4, (2), have been determined: (1) crystallizes with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. A comparison of the dihedral angles beween the mean planes of the central chromone core with those of the substituents, an ethyl ester moiety at the 2-position and apara-substituted phenyl ring at the 6-position shows that each molecule differs significantly from the others, even the two independent molecules (aandb) of (1). In all three molecules, the carbonyl groups of the chromone and the carboxylate aretrans-related. The supramolecular structure of (1) involves only weak C—H...π interactions between H atoms of the substituent phenyl group and the phenyl group, which link molecules into a chain of alternating moleculesaandb, and weak π–π stacking interactions between the chromone units. The packing in (2) involves C—H...O interactions, which form a network of two intersecting ladders involving the carbonyl atom of the carboxylate group as the acceptor for H atoms at the 7-position of the chromone ring and from anortho-H atom of the exocyclic benzene ring. The carbonyl atom of the chromone acts as an acceptor from ameta-H atom of the exocyclic benzene ring. π–π interactions stack the molecules by unit translation along theaaxis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 68 (10) ◽  
pp. o408-o412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashokkumar Subashini ◽  
Kandasamy Ramamurthi ◽  
Helen Stoeckli-Evans

The 4-chloro- [C14H11ClN2O2, (I)], 4-bromo- [C14H10BrN2O2, (II)] and 4-diethylamino- [C18H21N3O2, (III)] derivatives of benzylidene-4-hydroxybenzohydrazide, all crystallize in the same space group (P21/c), (I) and (II) also being isomorphous. In all three compounds, the conformation about the C=N bond isE. The molecules of (I) and (II) are relatively planar, with dihedral angles between the two benzene rings of 5.75 (12) and 9.81 (17)°, respectively. In (III), however, the same angle is 77.27 (9)°. In the crystal structures of (I) and (II), two-dimensional slab-like networks extending in theaandcdirections are formedviaN—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The molecules stack head-to-tailviaπ–π interactions involving the aromatic rings [centroid–centroid distance = 3.7622 (14) Å in (I) and 3.8021 (19) Å in (II)]. In (III), undulating two-dimensional networks extending in thebandcdirections are formedviaN—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The molecules stack head-to-headviaπ–π interactions involving inversion-related benzene rings [centroid–centroid distances = 3.6977 (12) and 3.8368 (11) Å].


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. o421-o422
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahid ◽  
Muhammad Nawaz Tahir ◽  
Muhammad Salim ◽  
Munawar Ali Munawar ◽  
Hazoor Ahmad Shad

In the title zwitterionic compound, C20H15N3O3S2, the 2-hydroxynaphthalene-1-carbaldehyde groupA, the anilinic unitBand the 1,3-thiazol-2(3H)-imine groupCare each approximately planar with r.m.s. deviation of 0.0721, 0.0412 and 0.0125 Å, respectively. The dihedral angles betweenA/B,A/CandB/Care 24.70 (10), 79.97 (7) and 83.14 (6)°, respectively. There is an intramolecularS(6) motif involving the imine N—H and the naphtholate O atom. In the crystal, inversion-related molecules form dimers as a result of N—H...N and N—H...O hydrogen bonds withR22(8) andR12(4) motifs, respectively. Weak π–π interactions between the benzene and naphthyl rings of inversion-related molecules have ring centroid–centroid distances of 3.638 (2) and 4.041 (2) Å. A C—H...π interaction occurs between the thiazol ring and the benzene ring of an adjacent molecule.


IUCrData ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manisha Choudhury ◽  
Vijayan Viswanathan ◽  
Ajay Kumar Timiri ◽  
Barij Nayan Sinha ◽  
Venkatesan Jayaprakash ◽  
...  

In the title compound, C13H15N5O2S, the acetamide N—C(=O)—C plane makes dihedral angles of 30.51 (11) and 51.93 (11)°, respectively, with the benzene ring and the pyrimidine ring. The dihedral angle between the benzene and pyrimidine rings is 43.40 (6)°. There is an intramolecular N—H...N hydrogen bond with an S(7) ring motif. In the crystal, molecules are linked by pairs of intermolecular N—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers with an R 2 2(8) ring motif. The molecules are further linked by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a C(9) chain along [100]. Intermolecular C—H...π and N—H...π interactions are also observed.


IUCrData ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry P. Jasinski ◽  
Mehmet Akkurt ◽  
Shaaban K. Mohamed ◽  
Evan M. Dunkley ◽  
Mustafa R. Albayati

In the title compound, C22H20ClN3O, the dihedral angle between the planes of the chlorophenyl and dimethylphenyl rings is 66.50 (9)°. These rings make dihedral angles 47.79 (8) and 69.24 (9)°, respectively, with the central benzene ring. In the crystal, molecules are linked into a three-dimensional supramolecular network by N—H...O, C—H...O hydrogen bonds and weak C—H...π interactions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 1488-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yum Eryanti ◽  
Adel Zamri ◽  
Tati Herlina ◽  
Unang Supratman ◽  
Mohd Mustaqim Rosli ◽  
...  

The title compounds, C20H19NO3, (1), and C20H17Cl2NO, (2), are the 3-hydroxybenzylidene and 2-chlorobenzylidene derivatives, respectively, of curcumin [systematic name: (1E,6E)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione]. The dihedral angles between the benzene rings in each compound are 21.07 (6)° for (1) and 13.4 (3)° for (2). In both compounds, the piperidinone rings adopt a sofa confirmation and the methyl group attached to the N atom is in an equatorial position. In the crystal of (1), two pairs of O—H...N and O—H...O hydrogen bonds link the molecules, forming chains along [10-1]. The chains are linkedviaC—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming undulating sheets parallel to theacplane. In the crystal of (2), molecules are linked by weak C—H...Cl hydrogen bonds, forming chains along the [204] direction. The chains are linked along thea-axis direction by π–π interactions [inter-centroid distance = 3.779 (4) Å]. For compound (2), the crystal studied was a non-merohedral twin with the refined ratio of the twin components being 0.116 (6):0.886 (6).


2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 199-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Raghuvarman ◽  
R. Sivakumar ◽  
V. Thanikachalam ◽  
S. Aravindhan

In the title compounds, C27H28N2O3, (I), and C28H30N2O3, (II), the conformation about the C=N bond isE. The piperidine rings adopt chair conformations with the attached phenyl rings almost normal to their mean planes, the dihedral angles being 85.82 (8) and 85.84 (7)° in (I), and 87.98 (12) and 86.42 (13)° in (II). The phenyl rings are inclined to one another by 52.87 (8)° in (I) and by 60.51 (14)° in (II). The main difference in the conformation of the two compounds is the angle of inclination of the phenoxycarbonyl ring to the piperidine ring mean plane. In (I), these two planes are almost coplanar, with a dihedral angle of 2.05 (8)°, while in (II), this angle is 45.24 (13)°. In the crystal of (I), molecules are linked by C—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers withR22(14) loops. The dimers are linkedviaC—H...π interactions forming a three-dimensional network. In the crystal of (II), there are no significant intermolecular interactions present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document