NASD publishes initial proposal to change conflict of interest rules relating to underwriting of public offerings in the United States

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Charles S. Gittleman ◽  
Russell D. Sacks

Firms generally begin as privately owned entities. When they grow large enough, the decision to go public and its consequences are among the most crucial times in a firm’s life cycle. The first time a firm is a reporting issuer gives rise to tremendous responsibilities about disclosing public information and accountability to a wide array of retail shareholders and institutional investors. Initial public offerings (IPOs) offer tremendous opportunities to raise capital. The economic and legal landscape for IPOs has been rapidly evolving across countries. There have been fewer IPOs in the United States in the aftermath of the 2007–2009 financial crisis and associated regulatory reforms that began in 2002. In 1980–2000, an average of 310 firms went public every year, while in 2001–2014 an average of 110 firms went public every year. At the same time, there are so many firms that seek an IPO in China that there has been a massive waiting list of hundreds of firms in recent years. Some countries are promoting small junior stock exchanges to go public early, and even crowdfunding to avoid any prospectus disclosure. Financial regulation of analysts and investment banks has been evolving in ways that drastically impact the economics of going public—in some countries, such as the United States, drastically increasing the minimum size of a company before it can expect to go public. This Handbook not only systematically and comprehensively consolidates a large body of literature on IPOs, but provides a foundation for future debates and inquiry.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepa V. Cherla ◽  
Cristina P. Viso ◽  
Julie L. Holihan ◽  
Karla Bernardi ◽  
Maya L. Moses ◽  
...  

Health Policy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinn Grundy ◽  
Roojin Habibi ◽  
Adrienne Shnier ◽  
Christopher Mayes ◽  
Wendy Lipworth

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1663-1692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohui Gao ◽  
Jay R. Ritter ◽  
Zhongyan Zhu

AbstractDuring 1980–2000, an average of 310 companies per year went public in the United States. Since 2000, the average has been only 99 initial public offerings (IPOs) per year, with the drop especially precipitous among small firms. Many have blamed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the 2003 Global Settlement’s effects on analyst coverage for the decline in IPO activity. We find very little support for the conventional wisdom, and we offer an alternative explanation. Our economies of scope hypothesis posits that the advantages of selling out to a larger organization, which can speed a product to market and realize economies of scope, have increased relative to the benefits of operating as an independent firm.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 363-384
Author(s):  
Dane P Blevins ◽  
Amy Ingram ◽  
Eric WK Tsang ◽  
Mike W Peng

Language is increasingly recognized as having the ability to shape strategic outcomes. To understand language’s impact in entrepreneurial settings, we study language in the context of foreign initial public offerings, a setting where organizations may suffer from both the liabilities of newness and foreignness. Our sample consists of the population of foreign initial public offerings debuting in the United States between 2001 and 2014, which collectively raised over US$60 billion in capital. We find that both new ventures’ and the media’s language impact investors by influencing the level of interest in the foreign initial public offerings. We also reveal that the media’s use of analogies plays a pivotal role in familiarizing and legitimizing unfamiliar organizations. Overall, our study offers insights into the power of words in managing the challenges associated with the liabilities of newness and foreignness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document