Software reliability model with optimal selection of failure data

1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1095-1104 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.F. Schneidewind
Keyword(s):  
Software Reliability ◽  
Reliability Model ◽  
Optimal Selection ◽  
Failure Data ◽  
Software Reliability Model ◽  
Selection Of

A SOFTWARE RELIABILITY MODEL FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROGRAMS

1993 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 99-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
FAROKH B. BASTANI ◽  
ING-RAY CHEN ◽  
TA-WEI TSAO
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Planning Problem ◽  
Reliability Growth ◽  
Reliability Model ◽  
Reliability Models ◽  
Failure Data ◽  
Software Reliability Models ◽  
Software Reliability Model ◽  
Correctness Criterion

In this paper we develop a software reliability model for Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs. We show that conventional software reliability models must be modified to incorporate certain special characteristics of AI programs, such as (1) failures due to intrinsic faults, e.g., limitations due to heuristics and other basic AI techniques, (2) fuzzy correctness criterion, i.e., difficulty in accurately classifying the output of some AI programs as correct or incorrect, (3) planning-time versus execution-time tradeoffs, and (4) reliability growth due to an evolving knowledge base. We illustrate the approach by modifying the Musa-Okumoto software reliability growth model to incorporate failures due to intrinsic faults and to accept fuzzy failure data. The utility of the model is exemplified with a robot path-planning problem.

BAYESIAN SOFTWARE RELIABILITY MODEL COMBINING TWO PRIORS AND PREDICTING TOTAL NUMBER OF FAILURES AND FAILURE TIME

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (06) ◽  
pp. 1450031 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. DAMODARAN ◽  
B. RAVIKUMAR ◽  
VELIMUTHU RAMACHANDRAN
Keyword(s):  
Bayesian Approach ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Reliability Model ◽  
Software Failure ◽  
Failure Times ◽  
Failure Data ◽  
Time Between Failures ◽  
Software Reliability Model ◽  
Proposed Model

Reliability statistics is divided into two mutually exclusive camps and they are Bayesian and Classical. The classical statistician believes that all distribution parameters are fixed values whereas Bayesians believe that parameters are random variables and have a distribution of their own. Bayesian approach has been applied for the Software Failure data and as a result of that several Bayesian Software Reliability Models have been formulated for the last three decades. A Bayesian approach to software reliability measurement was taken by Littlewood and Verrall [A Bayesian reliability growth model for computer software, Appl. Stat. 22 (1973) 332–346] and they modeled hazard rate as a random variable. In this paper, a new Bayesian software reliability model is proposed by combining two prior distributions for predicting the total number of failures and the next failure time of the software. The popular and realistic Jelinski and Moranda (J&M) model is taken as a base for bringing out this model by applying Bayesian approach. It is assumed that one of the parameters of JM model N, number of faults in the software follows uniform prior distribution and another failure rate parameter Φi follows gama prior distribution. The joint prior p(N, Φi) is obtained by combining the above two prior distributions. In this Bayesian model, the time between failures follow exponential distribution with failure rate parameter with stochastically decreasing order on successive failure time intervals. The reasoning for the assumption on the parameter is that the intention of the software tester to improve the software quality by the correction of each failure. With Bayesian approach, the predictive distribution has been arrived at by combining exponential Time between Failures (TBFs) and joint prior p(N, Φi). For the parameter estimation, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method has been adopted. The proposed Bayesian software reliability model has been applied to two sets of act. The proposed model has been applied to two sets of actual software failure data and it has been observed that the predicted failure times as per the proposed model are closer to the actual failure times. The predicted failure times based on Littlewood–Verall (LV) model is also computed. Sum of square errors (SSE) criteria has been used for comparing the actual time between failures and predicted time between failures based on proposed model and LV model.

scholarly journals NHPP Software Reliability Model with Inflection Factor of the Fault Detection Rate Considering the Uncertainty of Software Operating Environments and Predictive Analysis

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song ◽  
Chang ◽  
Pham
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Reliability Model ◽  
New Model ◽  
Software Failures ◽  
Software Failure ◽  
Software Reliability Model ◽  
Operating Environments

The non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) software has a crucial role in computer systems. Furthermore, the software is used in various environments. It was developed and tested in a controlled environment, while real-world operating environments may be different. Accordingly, the uncertainty of the operating environment must be considered. Moreover, predicting software failures is commonly an important part of study, not only for software developers, but also for companies and research institutes. Software reliability model can measure and predict the number of software failures, software failure intervals, software reliability, and failure rates. In this paper, we propose a new model with an inflection factor of the fault detection rate function, considering the uncertainty of operating environments and analyzing how the predicted value of the proposed new model is different than the other models. We compare the proposed model with several existing NHPP software reliability models using real software failure datasets based on ten criteria. The results show that the proposed new model has significantly better goodness-of-fit and predictability than the other models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document