scholarly journals Optimized Handling Stability Control Strategy for a Four In-Wheel Motor Independent-Drive Electric Vehicle

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 17017-17032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Chen ◽  
Sizhong Chen ◽  
Yuzhuang Zhao ◽  
Zepeng Gao ◽  
Changlong Li
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Shu Wang ◽  
Xuan Zhao ◽  
Qiang Yu

Vehicle stability control should accurately interpret the driving intention and ensure that the actual state of the vehicle is as consistent as possible with the desired state. This paper proposes a vehicle stability control strategy, which is based on recognition of the driver’s turning intention, for a dual-motor drive electric vehicle. A hybrid model consisting of Gaussian mixture hidden Markov (GHMM) and Generalized Growing and Pruning RBF (GGAP-RBF) neural network is constructed to recognize the driver turning intention in real time. The turning urgency coefficient, which is computed on the basis of the recognition results, is used to establish a modified reference model for vehicle stability control. Then, the upper controller of the vehicle stability control system is constructed using the linear model predictive control theory. The minimum of the quadratic sum of the working load rate of the vehicle tire is taken as the optimization objective. The tire-road adhesion condition, performance of the motor and braking system, and state of the motor are taken as constraints. In addition, a lower controller is established for the vehicle stability control system, with the task of optimizing the allocation of additional yaw moment. Finally, vehicle tests were carried out by conducting double-lane change and single-lane change experiments on a platform for dual-motor drive electric vehicles by using the virtual controller of the A&D5435 hardware. The results show that the stability control system functions appropriately using this control strategy and effectively improves the stability of the vehicle.


Engineering ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. 338-350
Author(s):  
Bo Peng ◽  
Huanhuan Zhang ◽  
Peiteng Zhao

Author(s):  
Zhang Chuanwei ◽  
Zhang Dongsheng ◽  
Wang Rui ◽  
Zhang Rongbo ◽  
Wen Jianping

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 3339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao ◽  
Lu ◽  
Zhang

A Stackelberg game-based cooperative control strategy is proposed for enhancing the lateral stability of a four-wheel independently driving electric vehicle (FWID-EV). An upper‒lower double-layer hierarchical control structure is adopted for the design of a stability control strategy. The leader‒follower-based Stackelberg game theory (SGT) is introduced to model the interaction between two unequal active chassis control subsystems in the upper layer. In this model, the direct yaw-moment control (DYC) and the active four-wheel steering (AFWS) are treated as the leader and the follower, respectively, based on their natural characteristics. Then, in order to guarantee the efficiency and convergence of the proposed control strategy, a sequential quadratic programming (SQP) algorithm is employed to solve the task allocation problem among the distributed actuators in the lower layer. Also, a double-mode adaptive weight (DMAW)- adjusting mechanism is designed, considering the negative effect of DYC. The results of cosimulation with CarSim and Matlab/Simulink demonstrate that the proposed control strategy can effectively improve the lateral stability by properly coordinating the actions of AFWS and DYC.


2013 ◽  
Vol 437 ◽  
pp. 669-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Fei Yang ◽  
Lu Xiong ◽  
Zhuo Ping Yu

Design the stability control strategy of four in-wheel-motors drive electric vehicle (EV) based on control allocation. Two kinds of control allocation methods are designed in this paper, one is the quadratic programming (QP), and the other is a simplified optimization method (SOM). Comparing and evaluating the control strategies through the co-simulation with MATLAB software and CARSIM software. The results of the simulation show: both strategies could stabilize the vehicle posture well under critical condition. QP has more accuracy than SOM, and could rebuild the system automatically when the motor fails. But the SOM doesn’t need iteration, could be possible to use in the real vehicle.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1542-1554
Author(s):  
Yantao Tian ◽  
Xuanhao Cao ◽  
Xiaoyu Wang ◽  
Yanbo Zhao

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document