A novel foot interface versus voice for controlling a robotic endoscope holder

Author(s):  
Yan-Jun Yang ◽  
Soumith Udatha ◽  
Dana Kulic ◽  
Elahe Abdi
Author(s):  
Peng Li ◽  
Hiu Man Yip ◽  
David Navarro-Alarcon ◽  
Yunhui Liu ◽  
Chi Fai Michael Tong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiangquan Sun ◽  
Yucheng He ◽  
Ying Hu ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Hong Zhang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dongbo Zhou ◽  
Shintaro Kimura ◽  
Hayato Takeyama ◽  
Daisuke Haraguchi ◽  
Yoshihiro Kaizu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Zappa ◽  
Alba Madoglio ◽  
Marco Ferrari ◽  
Davide Mattavelli ◽  
Alberto Schreiber ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Only preclinical studies and case reports have described robotic surgery for endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of a novel robotic endoscope holder, developed for transsphenoidal surgery. METHODS Patients were prospectively enrolled for 3 mo at the Neurosurgery Unit of Brescia. Endoscope Robot® was used to assist during the sphenoidal phase of the approach, tumor removal, and skull base reconstruction. A Likert scale questionnaire was given to all surgeons after each procedure. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted surgery were matched with nonrobotic ones for pathology and type of procedure. All surgical videos were evaluated during bimanual phases. RESULTS Twenty-one patients underwent robot-assisted, endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for different pathologies (16 pituitary adenomas, 3 chordomas, 1 craniopharyngioma, 1 pituitary exploration for Cushing disease) for a total of 23 procedures (1 patient underwent 2 endoscopic revisions of a skull base reconstruction). Subjective advantages reported by surgeons included smoothness of movement, image steadiness, and improvement of maneuvers in narrow spaces and with angled endoscopes; as the main limitation, Endoscope Robot® appeared to be relatively heavy during the initial endoscope positioning. A comparative analysis with a historical matched cohort documented similar clinical outcomes, while endoscope lens cleaning and position readjustments were significantly less frequent in robotic procedures. CONCLUSION Although confirmation in larger studies is needed, Endoscope Robot® was a safe and effective tool, especially advantageous in lengthy interventions through deep and narrow corridors.


Author(s):  
Sung-Chi Chiang ◽  
Yang-Cheng Huang ◽  
Kuan Shen ◽  
Jia-Yush Yen

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessie Young ◽  
Haytham Elhawary ◽  
Aleksandra Popovic

We have integrated the Philips Research robot arm with the Johns Hopkins cisst library, an open-source platform for computer assisted surgical intervention, for assistance during minimally invasive cardiac surgery using image-based steering of an endoscope. The development of a Matlab to C++ wrapper to abstract away servo-level details facilitates the rapid development of a component-based framework with “plug and play” features. This allows the user to easily exchange the robot with an alternative manipulator while maintaining the same overall functionality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document