Preparatory mathematics course for non-traditional engineering students

Author(s):  
Nina Kalberer ◽  
Katrin Tschirpke ◽  
Cornelia Bohmer ◽  
Eva-Maria Beck-Meuth
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Kälberer ◽  
Cornelia Böhmer ◽  
Katrin Tschirpke ◽  
Brigitte Petendra ◽  
Eva Maria Beck-Meuth

This paper reports the concept of a preparatory mathematics course for non-traditional students in electrical engineering, and its evaluation. The blended-learning course is part of the initial study phase smoothing the transition to learning at university level. The instructional design of the preparatory course is aligned with that of the Bachelor’s study program. However, it takes place prior to the beginning of the first semester. The initial phase additionally encompasses the whole first semester with different courses meant to help students getting ready for studying. Prospective students indicated that they needed to refresh their knowledge in mathematics. Thus, a preparatory mathematics course was given priority. This course serves several purposes: Students get an impression of the requirements in mathematics necessary for the study program; they refresh their basic knowledge; they make themselves familiar with self-organized learning and the blended-learning concept of the program. Design and implementation were evaluated with a questionnaire at the end of the course and after the first semester. The results show that the course is an appropriate instrument prior to engineering studies in order to prepare and support non-traditional students. In the conclusions potential for improvement is identified.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Braun ◽  
Stefan Ritter ◽  
Mikko Vasko

The inverted classroom is a teaching model, where the students prepare for classroom by watching video lectures. The classroom time is then dedicated to individual practice. We evaluated a mathematics course for electrical engineering students throughout three semesters, where 20% of the topics were taught using the inverted classroom model. The aim was to find out whether the model can help to better address groups with large differences in prior knowledge in mathematics. We report mainly positive feedback from the students, although the opinions vary greatly between the groups. The students appreciate the increased amount of practice in the classroom as well as the possibility to learn at their own pace. Exam performance remained constant in the topics taught using the inverted classroom compared to previous semesters. The exam performance of weaker students also remained constant.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1009-1030
Author(s):  
Jonas Gallenkämper ◽  
Bernhard Heim ◽  
Judith Kreuzer ◽  
Florian Rupp ◽  
Paul von Stockhausen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Athavale ◽  
Sumona Mondal ◽  
Seema Rivera

Several studies have been conducted to understand the predictors of academic performance of various levels of high school and undergraduate students as quantified by the grade point average. This study focuses specifically on engineering students as they differ from other undergraduate students in their background and expectations. We focus on quantifying essential predictors of the performance of engineering students in an advanced mathematics course. We collected data from 72 participants recruited from engineering students enrolled in the advanced engineering mathematics (AEM) course in a research university. We chose this course to represent a standard engineering mathematics course covering several essential topics. We consider several factors in our analysis, such as cellphone usage and the academic background, e.g., the academic year, number of minors, and majors, performance in prerequisite courses. We perform several regression analyses to understand the effects of cellphone usage, course schedule, and academic background on performance in the AEM course and its prerequisites. In particular, we use the stepwise regression technique using forward selection and backward elimination procedures. We discovered a few interesting findings in this case study. Firstly, for the participants in this study, we find that the daily average “screen time” on their cellphones is not a statistically significant predictor of student performance. This finding contradicts some prior studies on this participant and may indicate adaption and integration of the technology by the new generation of students in recent years. We also found that the lecturing schedule was not an influential factor for their academic performance. These findings are especially relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic, as they suggest that advanced engineering students have adapted to the use of technology and are flexible concerning lecture schedules. Another unexpected finding is that this study brings new evidence that the number of minors taken by the participants is a negative predictor of their grade in the AEM course. This observation may indicate that course-work from non-major classes may adversely impact their performance in mathematical engineering courses.


1983 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald G. Taylor ◽  
Robert D. Whetstone
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Earl Nolting ◽  
Ronald G. Taylor

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document