scholarly journals Mining cross-frequency coupling microstates (CFCμstates) from EEG recordings during resting state and mental arithmetic tasks

Author(s):  
Stavros I. Dimitriadis ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Nitish Thakor ◽  
Anastasios Bezerianos
2016 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marios Antonakakis ◽  
Stavros I. Dimitriadis ◽  
Michalis Zervakis ◽  
Sifis Micheloyannis ◽  
Roozbeh Rezaie ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Janet Giehl ◽  
Nima Noury ◽  
Markus Siegel

AbstractPhase-amplitude coupling (PAC) has been hypothesized to coordinate cross-frequency interactions of neuronal activity in the brain. However, little is known about the distribution of PAC across the human brain and the frequencies involved. Furthermore, it remains unclear to what extend PAC may reflect spurious cross-frequency coupling induced by physiological artifacts or rhythmic non-sinusoidal signals with higher harmonics. Here, we combined MEG, source-reconstruction and different measures of cross-frequency coupling to systematically characterize PAC across the resting human brain. We show that cross-frequency measures of phase-amplitude, phase-phase, and amplitude-amplitude coupling are all sensitive to signals with higher harmonics. In conjunction, these measures allow to distinguish harmonic and non-harmonic PAC. Based on these insights, we found no evidence for non-harmonic PAC in resting-state MEG. Instead, we found cortically and spectrally wide-spread PAC driven by harmonic signals. Furthermore, we show how physiological artifacts and spectral leakage cause spurious PAC across wide frequency ranges. Our result clarify how different measures of cross-frequency interactions can be combined to characterize PAC and cast doubt on the presence of prominent non-harmonic phase-amplitude coupling in human resting-state MEG.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edden M. Gerber ◽  
Boaz Sadeh ◽  
Andrew Ward ◽  
Robert T. Knight ◽  
Leon Y. Deouell

AbstractThe analysis of cross-frequency coupling (CFC) has become popular in studies involving intracranial and scalp EEG recordings in humans. It has been argued that some cases where CFC is mathematically present may not reflect an interaction of two distinct yet functionally coupled neural sources with different frequencies. Here we provide two empirical examples from intracranial recordings where CFC can be shown to be driven by the shape of a periodic waveform rather than by a functional interaction between distinct sources. Using simulations, we also present a generalized and realistic scenario where such coupling may arise. This scenario, which we term waveform-dependent CFC, arises when sharp waveforms (e.g., cortical potentials) occur in a periodic manner throughout parts of the data. Since the waveforms are repeated periodically, they constitute a slow wave that is inherently phase-aligned with the high-frequency component carried by the same waveforms. We submit that such behavior of the data, which seems to be present in various cortical signals, cannot be interpreted as reflecting functional modulation between distinct neural sources without additional evidence. In addition, we show that even low amplitude periodic potentials that cannot be readily observed or controlled for, are sufficient for significant CFC to occur.


2017 ◽  
Vol 356 ◽  
pp. 63-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Hee Ahn ◽  
Sung Kwang Hong ◽  
Byoung-Kyong Min

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document