Monitoring Water Quality in the Great Lakes Leveraging Geo-Temporal Cyberinfrastructure

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Indira Gutierrez-Polo ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Shannon Bradley ◽  
Eugene Roeder ◽  
Michelle Pitcel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes

Agriculture and Water Quality in the Canadian Great Lakes Basin: II. Fluvial Sediments

1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 482-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Wall ◽  
W. T. Dickinson ◽  
L. J. P. Vliet
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes ◽  
Fluvial Sediments ◽  
Great Lakes Basin

A storm water retrofit plan for the mimico creek watershed

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 133-140
Author(s):  
J. Y. Li ◽  
D. Banting
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Quality Management ◽  
Great Lakes ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Water Quality Management ◽  
Storm Water ◽  
Planning Tool ◽  
Creek Watershed ◽  
Urbanized Areas ◽  
Goals And Objectives

Storm water quality management in urbanized areas remains a challenge to Canadian municipalities as the funding and planning mechanisms are not well defined. In order to provide assistance to urbanized municipalities in the Great Lakes areas, the Great Lakes 2000 Cleanup Fund and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment commissioned the authors to develop a Geographic Information System planning tool for storm water quality management in urbanized areas. The planning tool comprises five steps: (1) definition of storm water retrofit goals and objectives; (2) identification of appropriate retrofit storm water management practices; (3) formulation of storm water retrofit strategies; (4) evaluation of strategies with respect to retrofit goals and objectives; and (5) selection of storm water retrofit strategies. A case study of the fully urbanized Mimico Creek wateshed in the City of Toronto is used to demonstrate the application of the planning tool.

scholarly journals Renegotiating the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement: The Process for a Sustainable Outcome

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Krantzberg
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes

Change in biomass of benthic and planktonic algae along a disturbance gradient for 24 Great Lakes coastal wetlands

2003 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 676-689 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila A McNair ◽  
Patricia Chow-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes ◽  
Chlorophyll A ◽  
Total Variation ◽  
Coastal Wetlands ◽  
Phytoplankton Biomass ◽  
Wetland Management ◽  
Percent Cover ◽  
Planktonic Algae ◽  
Wide Range

We quantified the chlorophyll a content of planktonic algae and benthic algae in periphyton on acrylic rods and in epiphyton growing on macrophytes in 24 coastal wetlands in all five Laurentian Great Lakes. Sites were selected to represent a wide range of environmental conditions ranging from nutrient-poor, clear-water marshes with abundant macrophytes to nutrient-enriched, turbid systems devoid of aquatic vegetation. Water quality and species and percent cover of submergent macrophytes were measured in each wetland. Principal components analysis (PCA) showed that total phosphorus, turbidity, and suspended solids, variables associated with human-induced degradation, were most strongly correlated with PC axis 1 (PC1), accounting for 69% of the total variation. The PC1 site score was significantly related to both periphyton and phytoplankton biomass, respectively accounting for 54 and 70% of the total variation in periphyton and phytoplankton data, whereas PC1 only accounted for 18% of the variation in epiphyton biomass. Periphytic and epiphytic biomass were negatively correlated with percent cover and species richness of submergent macrophytes, but phytoplankton biomass was not. We conclude that periphytic and planktonic chlorophyll a biomass are good indicators of human-induced water-quality degradation and recommend that both benthic and planktonic algal biomass should be routinely monitored as part of an effective wetland management program.

The Great Lakes Water Quality Agreements

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Langston
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes ◽  
The United States ◽  
Joint Commission ◽  
International Joint Commission ◽  
International Joint ◽  
The 1960S

By the 1960s, the failures of research and cooperative pragmatism to control Great Lakes pollution were becoming painfully evident. In 1972 Canada and the United States signed the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. The agreement was groundbreaking in its focus on cleaning up existing pollution and preventing new pollutants, but the International Joint Commission has no authority to force the two nations to implement recommendations. Therefore, when Canada or the United States refuses to abide by the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement (in its various revisions), very little happens in response—besides calls for more research.

Real‐Time Water Quality Monitoring at a Great Lakes National Park

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1086-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muruleedhara N. Byappanahalli ◽  
Meredith B. Nevers ◽  
Dawn A. Shively ◽  
Ashley Spoljaric ◽  
Christopher Otto
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes ◽  
Real Time ◽  
National Park ◽  
Water Quality Monitoring ◽  
Quality Monitoring

Linking Weather Patterns, Water Quality And Invasive Mussel Distributions In The Development And Application Of A Water Clarity Index For The Great Lakes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varis Ransibrahmanakul ◽  
Simon J. Pittman ◽  
Douglas E. Pirhalla ◽  
Scott C. Sheridan ◽  
Cameron C. Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes ◽  
Water Clarity ◽  
Weather Patterns ◽  
Invasive Mussel

scholarly journals Evolution of the Great Lakes water quality agreement

2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (01) ◽  
pp. 44-0330-44-0330
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Great Lakes
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document