Fuelling and disruption mitigation in ITER

Author(s):  
S. Maruyama ◽  
Y. Yang ◽  
M. Sugihara ◽  
R. A. Pitts ◽  
B. Li ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 132 (7) ◽  
pp. 468-471
Author(s):  
Roger Raman ◽  
Daren P. Stotler ◽  
Tyler Abrams ◽  
Stephan P. Gerhardt ◽  
Thomas R. Jarboe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 052501
Author(s):  
J. Ghosh ◽  
R. L. Tanna ◽  
P. K. Chattopadhyay ◽  
A. Sen ◽  
Harshita Raj ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lvovskiy ◽  
H. R. Koslowski ◽  
L. Zeng ◽  

Disruptions with runaway electron generation have been deliberately induced by injection of argon using a disruption mitigation valve. A second disruption mitigation valve has been utilised to inject varying amounts of helium after a short time delay. No generation of runaway electrons has been observed when more than a critical amount of helium has been injected no later than 5 ms after the triggering of the first valve. The required amount of helium for suppression of runaway electron generation is up to one order of magnitude lower than the critical density according to Connor & Hastie (1975) and Rosenbluth & Putvinski (1997).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
You Li ◽  
Zhong yong Chen ◽  
Wei Yan ◽  
Yu Wei ◽  
Ruihai Tong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R Baylor ◽  
Steve J Meitner ◽  
Trey E Gebhart ◽  
John B. O. Caughman ◽  
Daisuke Shiraki ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 438 ◽  
pp. S871-S874 ◽  
Author(s):  
I.S. Landman ◽  
S.E. Pestchanyi ◽  
Y. Igitkhanov ◽  
R. Pitts

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 056002 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Murari ◽  
M. Lungaroni ◽  
E. Peluso ◽  
P. Gaudio ◽  
J. Vega ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 123010 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lehnen ◽  
A. Alonso ◽  
G. Arnoux ◽  
N. Baumgarten ◽  
S.A. Bozhenkov ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 762-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. N. Bogatu ◽  
J. R. Thompson ◽  
S. A. Galkin ◽  
J. S. Kim ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document