Tandem HMM with convolutional neural network for handwritten word recognition

Author(s):  
Theodore Bluche ◽  
Hermann Ney ◽  
Christopher Kermorvant
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1794-1805
Author(s):  
Dibyasundar Das ◽  
Deepak Ranjan Nayak ◽  
Ratnakar Dash ◽  
Banshidhar Majhi ◽  
Yu-Dong Zhang

Author(s):  
Dyah Ayu Anggreini Tuasikal ◽  
M.B. Nugraha ◽  
Emilio Yudhatama ◽  
Ahmad Syahril Muharom ◽  
Megantara Pura

Author(s):  
Priyank Patel ◽  
Roshan Shinde ◽  
Siddhesh Raut ◽  
Sheetal Mahadik

The necessity for quick and precise content section on little handheld PCs has prompted a resurgence of interest in on-line word recognition utilizing counterfeit neural Networks. Old style strategies are consolidated and improved to give strong recognition of hand-printed English content. The focal idea of a neural net as a character classifier gives a legitimate base to are cognition framework; long-standing issues comparative with preparing, speculation, division, probabilistic formalisms, and so forth, need to settled, notwithstanding, to instigate astounding execution. assortment of developments in a manner to utilize a neural net as a classifier in a very word recognizer are introduced: negative preparing, stroke twisting, adjusting, standardized yield blunder, mistake accentuation, numerous portrayals, quantized loads, and incorporated word division all add to effective and hearty execution.


Author(s):  
XIAOLONG FAN ◽  
BRIJESH VERMA

This paper presents a comparative analysis of segmentation and non-segmentation based techniques for cursive handwritten word recognition. In our segmentation based technique, every word is segmented into characters, the chain code features are extracted from segmented characters, the features are fed to neural network classifier and finally the words are constructed using a string compare algorithm. In our non-segmentation based technique, the chain code features are extracted directly from words and the words are fed to a neural network classifier to classify them into word classes. To make a fair comparison, a CEDAR benchmark database is used, and the parameters such as the number of words, thresholding, resizing, feature extraction techniques, etc. are kept same for both the techniques. The experimental results and analysis show that the non-segmentation technique achieves higher recognition rate than the segmentation based technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document