scholarly journals Enhanced Weighted Method for Test Case Prioritization in Regression Testing Using Unique Priority Value

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asmaa Ammar ◽  
Salmi Baharom ◽  
Abdul Azim Abd Ghani ◽  
Jamilah Din
Keyword(s):  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Case Prioritization

scholarly journals Using Fuzzy Logic in Test Case Prioritization for Regression Testing Programs with Assertions

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali M. Alakeel
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Software Developers ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
History Of ◽  
Supporting Tool

Program assertions have been recognized as a supporting tool during software development, testing, and maintenance. Therefore, software developers place assertions within their code in positions that are considered to be error prone or that have the potential to lead to a software crash or failure. Similar to any other software, programs with assertions must be maintained. Depending on the type of modification applied to the modified program, assertions also might have to undergo some modifications. New assertions may also be introduced in the new version of the program, while some assertions can be kept the same. This paper presents a novel approach for test case prioritization during regression testing of programs that have assertions using fuzzy logic. The main objective of this approach is to prioritize the test cases according to their estimated potential in violating a given program assertion. To develop the proposed approach, we utilize fuzzy logic techniques to estimate the effectiveness of a given test case in violating an assertion based on the history of the test cases in previous testing operations. We have conducted a case study in which the proposed approach is applied to various programs, and the results are promising compared to untreated and randomly ordered test cases.

scholarly journals Evolutionary Cost-cognizant Test Case Selection and Prioritization for Object-Oriented Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6S3) ◽  
pp. 149-153
Keyword(s):  
Unit Cost ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Arbitrary Point ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Integration Testing ◽  
Maximum Benefit ◽  
Regression Test

Test case prioritization (TCP) is a software testing technique that finds an ideal ordering of test cases for regression testing, so that testers can obtain the maximum benefit of their test suite, even if the testing process is stop at some arbitrary point. The recent trend of software development uses OO paradigm. This paper proposed a cost-cognizant TCP approach for object-oriented software that uses path-based integration testing. Path-based integration testing will identify the possible execution path and extract these paths from the Java System Dependence Graph (JSDG) model of the source code using forward slicing technique. Afterward evolutionary algorithm (EA) was employed to prioritize test cases based on the severity detection per unit cost for each of the dependent faults. The proposed technique was known as Evolutionary Cost-Cognizant Regression Test Case Prioritization (ECRTP) and being implemented as regression testing approach for experiment.

scholarly journals Bi-Objective Constraint and Hybrid Optimizer for the Test Case Prioritization

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 3436-3448
Keyword(s):  
Taylor Series ◽  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Fitness Function ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Optimal Test ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
Branch Coverage

Regression testing is performed to make conformity that any changes in software program do not disturb the existing characteristics of the software. As the software improves, the test case tends to grow in size that makes it very costly to be executed, and thus the test cases are needed to be prioritized to select the effective test cases for software testing. In this paper, a test case prioritization technique in regression testing is proposed using a novel optimization algorithm known as Taylor series-based Jaya Optimization Algorithm (Taylor-JOA), which is the integration of Taylor series in Jaya Optimization Algorithm (JOA). The optimal test cases are selected based on the fitness function, modelled depending on the constraints, namely fault detection and branch coverage. The experimentation of the proposed Taylor-JOA is performed with the consideration of the evaluation metrics, namely Average Percentage of Fault Detected (APFD) and the Average Percentage of Branch Coverage (APBC). The APFD and the APBC of the proposed Taylor-JOA is 0.995, and 0.9917, respectively, which is high as compared to the existing methods that show the effectiveness of the proposed Taylor-JOA in the task of test case prioritization

Test Pair Selection for Test Case Prioritization in Regression Testing for WS-BPEL Programs

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lijun Mei ◽  
Yan Cai ◽  
Changjiang Jia ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
W.K. Chan
Keyword(s):  
Web Services ◽  
Structural Similarity ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Pair ◽  
Test Suite ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Empirical Results ◽  
Selection For

Many web services not only communicate through XML-based messages, but also may dynamically modify their behaviors by applying different interpretations on XML messages through updating the associated XML Schemas or XML-based interface specifications. Such artifacts are usually complex, allowing XML-based messages conforming to these specifications structurally complex. Testing should cost-effectively cover all scenarios. Test case prioritization is a dimension of regression testing that assures a program from unintended modifications by reordering the test cases within a test suite. However, many existing test case prioritization techniques for regression testing treat test cases of different complexity generically. In this paper, the authors exploit the insights on the structural similarity of XML-based artifacts between test cases in both static and dynamic dimensions, and propose a family of test case prioritization techniques that selects pairs of test case without replacement in turn. To the best of their knowledge, it is the first test case prioritization proposal that selects test case pairs for prioritization. The authors validate their techniques by a suite of benchmarks. The empirical results show that when incorporating all dimensions, some members of our technique family can be more effective than conventional coverage-based techniques.

Regression Test Case Prioritization Based on Fixed Size Candidate Set ART Algorithm

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (03) ◽  
pp. 291-320
Author(s):  
Rongcun Wang ◽  
Zhengmin Li ◽  
Shujuan Jiang ◽  
Chuanqi Tao
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Fixed Size ◽  
C Programs ◽  
Testing Algorithm ◽  
Candidate Set

Regression testing is a very time-consuming and expensive testing activity. Many test case prioritization techniques have been proposed to speed up regression testing. Previous studies show that no one technique is always best. Random strategy, as the simplest strategy, is not always so bad. Particularly, when a test suite has higher fault detection capability, the strategy can generate a better result. Nevertheless, due to the randomness, the strategy is not always as satisfactory as expected. In this context, we present a test case prioritization approach using fixed size candidate set adaptive random testing algorithm to reduce the effect of randomness and improve fault detection effectiveness. The distance between pair-wise test cases is assessed by exclusive OR. We designed and conducted empirical studies on eight C programs to validate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The experimental results, confirmed by a statistical analysis, indicate that the approach we proposed is more effective than random and the total greedy prioritization techniques in terms of fault detection effectiveness. Although the presented approach has comparable fault detection effectiveness to ART-based and the additional greedy techniques, the time cost is much lower. Consequently, the proposed approach is much more cost-effective.

scholarly journals Empirical Study of the Effects of Different Similarity Measures on Test Case Prioritization

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongcun Wang ◽  
Shujuan Jiang ◽  
Deng Chen ◽  
Yanmei Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Euclidean Distance ◽  
Similarity Measures ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Distance Information ◽  
The Common ◽  
Global Similarity ◽  
Execution Order

Similarity-based test case prioritization algorithms have been applied to regression testing. The common characteristic of these algorithms is to reschedule the execution order of test cases according to the distances between pair-wise test cases. The distance information can be calculated by different similarity measures. Since the topologies vary with similarity measures, the distances between pair-wise test cases calculated by different similarity measures are different. Similarity measures could significantly influence the effectiveness of test case prioritization. Therefore, we empirically evaluate the effects of six similarity measures on two similarity-based test case prioritization algorithms. The obtained results are statistically analyzed to recommend the best combination of similarity-based prioritization algorithms and similarity measures. The experimental results, confirmed by a statistical analysis, indicate that Euclidean distance is more efficient in finding defects than other similarity measures. The combination of the global similarity-based prioritization algorithm and Euclidean distance could be a better choice. It generates not only higher fault detection effectiveness but also smaller standard deviation. The goal of this study is to provide practical guides for picking the appropriate combination of similarity-based test case prioritization techniques and similarity measures.

scholarly journals K-Step Crossover Method based on Genetic Algorithm for Test Suite Prioritization in Regression Testing

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-189
Author(s):  
P. K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithm ◽  
Regression Testing ◽  
Test Suite ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Test Cases ◽  
Test Case Prioritization ◽  
Average Percentage ◽  
Code Coverage ◽  
Test Case Selection ◽  
Case Selection

Software is an integration of numerous programming modules  (e.g., functions, procedures, legacy system, reusable components, etc.) tested and combined to build the entire module. However, some undesired faults may occur due to a change in modules while performing validation and verification. Retesting of entire software is a costly affair in terms of money and time. Therefore, to avoid retesting of entire software, regression testing is performed. In regression testing, an earlier created test suite is used to retest the software system's modified module. Regression Testing works in three manners; minimizing test cases, selecting test cases, and prioritizing test cases. In this paper, a two-phase algorithm has been proposed that considers test case selection and test case prioritization technique for performing regression testing on several modules ranging from a smaller line of codes to huge line codes of procedural language. A textual based differencing algorithm has been implemented for test case selection. Program statements modified between two modules are used for textual differencing and utilized to identify test cases that affect modified program statements. In the next step, test case prioritization is implemented by applying the Genetic Algorithm for code/condition coverage. Genetic operators: Crossover and Mutation have been applied over the initial population (i.e. test cases), taking code/condition coverage as fitness criterion to provide a prioritized test suite. Prioritization algorithm can be applied over both original and reduced test suite depending upon the test suite's size or the need for accuracy. In the obtained results, the efficiency of the prioritization algorithms has been analyzed by the Average Percentage of Code Coverage (APCC) and Average Percentage of Code Coverage with cost (APCCc). A comparison of the proposed approach is also done with the previously proposed methods and it is observed that APCC & APCCc values achieve higher percentage values faster in the case of the prioritized test suite in contrast to the non-prioritized test suite.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document