Rigid body displacement constrained deformation

Author(s):  
Qi Huang ◽  
Chunning Jin ◽  
Ping Hu
2003 ◽  
Vol 331 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Gray ◽  
Stewart Moughon ◽  
Chu Wang ◽  
Ora Schueler-Furman ◽  
Brian Kuhlman ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1573-1594
Author(s):  
Geoffrey H. Campbell ◽  
Mukul Kumar ◽  
Wayne E. King ◽  
James Belak ◽  
John A. Moriarty ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Brian M. Korte ◽  
Andrew P. Murray ◽  
James P. Schmiedeler

This paper presents a procedure to synthesize planar linkages, composed of rigid links and revolute joints, capable of approximating a shape change defined by a set of curves. These “morphing curves” differ from each other by a combination of rigid-body displacement and shape change. Rigid link geometry is determined through analysis of piecewise linear curves to achieve shape-change approximation, and increasing the number of links improves the approximation. A mechanism is determined through connecting the rigid links into a single chain and adding dyads to eliminate degrees of freedom. The procedure is applied to two open-chain examples.


2002 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1573-1594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey H. Campbell ◽  
Mukul Kumar ◽  
Wayne E. King ◽  
James Belak ◽  
John A. Moriarty ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiaowei Feng ◽  
Susan Gourvenec

Embedment of offshore shallow foundations is typically achieved by ‘skirts’, i.e. thin vertical plates that protrude from the underside of a foundation top plate and penetrate the seabed confining a soil plug. Skirted shallow foundations are often idealized as a solid, rigid element for geotechnical analysis of the foundation, on the assumption that sufficient skirts, or ‘shear keys’ will be provided to ensure that the deformable soil plug displaces as a rigid body. Should too few shear keys be provided, failure mechanisms involving deformation within the soil plug may occur, leading to a reduction in load-carrying capacity. There is currently no formal guidance regarding the optimal spacing of shear keys to ensure rigid body displacement of the soil plug. The absence of guidance may lead to unconservative designs if the number of shear keys is under estimated to save on fabrication or to conservative designs if additional shear keys are provided to minimize the risk associated with the uncertainty. Either case is undesirable and clear benefit is to be gained from a better understanding of shear key spacing. This paper presents guidance on the minimum number of shear keys required to achieve optimal capacity of square and rectangular skirted foundations (i.e. equivalent to that of a solid rigid foundation) under undrained generalized six degree-of-freedom loading in soft soils with linearly increasing shear strength with depth.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document