Autonomous 3D Exploration of Indoor Environment Based on Wavefront Algorithm**This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61673288, 61773273).

Author(s):  
Chunhua Tang ◽  
Yefeng Liang ◽  
Shumei Yu ◽  
Rongchuan Sun ◽  
Jianying Zheng
Author(s):  
Hua Qian ◽  
Te Miao ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Xiaohong Zheng ◽  
Danting Luo ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundBy early April 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had infected nearly one million people and had spread to nearly all countries worldwide. It is essential to understand where and how SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted.MethodsCase reports were extracted from the local Municipal Health Commissions of 320 prefectural cities (municipalities) in China, not including Hubei province, between 4 January and 11 February 2020. We identified all outbreaks involving three or more cases and reviewed the major characteristics of the enclosed spaces in which the outbreaks were reported and associated indoor environmental issues.ResultsThree hundred and eighteen outbreaks with three or more cases were identified, involving 1245 confirmed cases in 120 prefectural cities. We divided the venues in which the outbreaks occurred into six categories: homes, transport, food, entertainment, shopping, and miscellaneous. Among the identified outbreaks, 53·8% involved three cases, 26·4% involved four cases, and only 1·6% involved ten or more cases. Home outbreaks were the dominant category (254 of 318 outbreaks; 79·9%), followed by transport (108; 34·0%; note that many outbreaks involved more than one venue category). Most home outbreaks involved three to five cases. We identified only a single outbreak in an outdoor environment, which involved two cases.ConclusionsAll identified outbreaks of three or more cases occurred in an indoor environment, which confirms that sharing indoor space is a major SARS-CoV-2 infection risk.FundingThe work was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong (no 17202719, C7025-16G), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (no 41977370).


1967 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin H. Marx
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-392
Author(s):  
Anita P. Barbee ◽  
Michael R. Cunningham

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Wolter ◽  
Kassandra Hauptmann ◽  
Alycia Hund
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
pp. 123-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Koshovets ◽  
T. Varkhotov

The paper considers the analogy of theoretical modeling and thought experiment in economics. The authors provide historical and epistemological analysis of thought experiments and their relations to the material experiments in natural science. They conclude that thought experiments as instruments are used both in physics and in economics, but in radically different ways. In the natural science, a thought experiment is tightly connected to the material experimentation, while in economics it is used in isolation. Material experiments serve as a means to demonstrate the reality, while thought experiments cannot be a full-fledged instrument of studying the reality. Rather, they constitute the instrument of structuring the field of inquiry.


Author(s):  
Juil Jeon ◽  
Juyoung Kim ◽  
Myoungin Ji ◽  
Youngsu Cho ◽  
Andrea Lingua ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document