Knitting technique and structural matrix for deadlock analysis and synthesis of Petri nets with sequential exclusion

Author(s):  
D.Y. Chao ◽  
D.T. Wang
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Unruh ◽  
Patrick Delfmann ◽  
Matthias Thimm
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 235-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
LAURA RECALDE ◽  
SERGE HADDAD ◽  
MANUEL SILVA

State explosion is a fundamental problem in the analysis and synthesis of discrete event systems. Continuous Petri nets can be seen as a relaxation of the corresponding discrete model. The expected gains are twofold: improvements in complexity and in decidability. In the case of autonomous nets we prove that liveness or deadlock-freeness remain decidable and can be checked more efficiently than in Petri nets. Then we introduce time in the model which now behaves as a dynamical system driven by differential equations and we study it w.r.t. expressiveness and decidability issues. On the one hand, we prove that this model is equivalent to timed differential Petri nets which are a slight extension of systems driven by linear differential equations (LDE). On the other hand, (contrary to the systems driven by LDEs) we show that continuous timed Petri nets are able to simulate Turing machines and thus that basic properties become undecidable.


Author(s):  
Michael Blondin ◽  
Christoph Haase ◽  
Philip Offtermatt

AbstractNumerous tasks in program analysis and synthesis reduce to deciding reachability in possibly infinite graphs such as those induced by Petri nets. However, the Petri net reachability problem has recently been shown to require non-elementary time, which raises questions about the practical applicability of Petri nets as target models. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for efficiently semi-deciding the reachability problem for Petri nets in practice. Our key insight is that computationally lightweight over-approximations of Petri nets can be used as distance oracles in classical graph exploration algorithms such as $$\mathsf {A}^{*}$$ A ∗ and greedy best-first search. We provide and evaluate a prototype implementation of our approach that outperforms existing state-of-the-art tools, sometimes by orders of magnitude, and which is also competitive with domain-specific tools on benchmarks coming from program synthesis and concurrent program analysis.


Author(s):  
Jens Lemcke ◽  
Andreas Friesen ◽  
Tirdad Rahmani

This chapter provides a formal specification of non-atomic, relaxed action refinement suited for component-based business process engineering. Engineering a business process involves multiple process models created by different people on different levels of abstractions. Keeping the models consistent during the engineering procedure—refinement validation—is one objective of this chapter. In component-based software engineering, the lowest abstraction of a business process is mapped on existing components that have a description of their behaviors. Checking the consistency of process and component behavior—grounding validation—is the second objective. Both refinement and grounding validation increase the robustness of business process implementations and the productivity of process engineers. Technically, the specification given in this chapter is in terms of deadlock analysis in safe Petri nets. The evaluation of this straight-forward implementation underlines the exponential complexity of deadlock analysis in safe Petri nets. For use cases with more than 30 activities per process or heavy parallelism, optimized implementations are needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document