Anatomically Based Computational Models of the Male and Female Pelvic Floor and Anal Canal

Author(s):  
K. F. Noakes ◽  
I. P. Bissett ◽  
A. J. Pullan ◽  
L. K. Cheng
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Ambar PINTO ◽  
Isaac José Felippe CORREA-NETO ◽  
Leonardo Alfonso BUSTAMANTE-LOPEZ ◽  
Caio Sergio R. NAHAS ◽  
Carlos Frederico S. MARQUES ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: Due to the lack of normal standards of anorectal manometry in Brazil, data used are subject to normality patterns described at different nationalities. Aim: To determine the values and range of the parameters evaluated at anorectal manometry in people, at productive age, without pelvic floor disorders comparing the parameters obtained between male and female. Methods: Prospective analysis of clinical data, such as gender, age, race, body mass index (BMI) and anorectal manometry, of volunteers from a Brazilian university reference in pelvic floor disorders. Results: Forty patients were included, with a mean age of 45.5 years in males and 37.2 females (p=0.43). According to male and female, respectively in mmHg, resting pressures were similar (78.28 vs. 63.51, p=0.40); squeeze pressures (153.89 vs. 79.78, p=0.007) and total squeeze pressures (231.27 vs. 145.63, p=0.002). Men presented significantly higher values of anorectal squeeze pressures, as well as the average length of the functional anal canal (2.85 cm in male vs. 2.45 cm in female, p=0.003). Conclusions: Normal sphincter pressure levels in Brazilians differ from those used until now as normal literature standards. Male gender has higher external anal sphincter tonus as compared to female, in addition a greater extension of the functional anal canal


2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
HIDEYASU MATSUYAMA ◽  
HIROSHI HIRATA ◽  
TAKESHI TOMIMATSU ◽  
GEN-ICHRO YAMAKAWA ◽  
MASATO TATSUMURA ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Gonzalez ◽  
Shayan Khorsandi ◽  
Megan Mathew ◽  
Ekene Enemchukwu ◽  
Raveen Syan

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 933-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. Miklos ◽  
Orawee Chinthakanan ◽  
Robert D. Moore ◽  
Gretchen K. Mitchell ◽  
Sheena Favors ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia R. Fielding ◽  
E. Versi ◽  
R. V. Mulkern ◽  
M. H. Lerner ◽  
D. J. Griffiths ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
G. Vignoli

The word “pelvic floor dysfunction” has different meanings in different specialties, i.e. radiology, urology, gynaecology, coloproctology. Despite the fact that the concept of perineology is not exactly new, most clinicians have only slowly adapted their practice to this transversal view. The multidisciplinary approach (several specialists dealing with various pelvic floor problems) still prevails over the interdisciplinary one (one specialist explaining what is happening) with several problems in the choice of therapeutic strategies. Obviously, the interdisciplinary approach requires a wide knowledge of the principles and techniques of each specialty. This monographic issue reviews advanced diagnostic testing for female pelvic floor dysfunctions from the perspective of a single specialist, namely a urologist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document