A novel dimension fusion based polynomial chaos approach for mixed aleatory-epistemic uncertainty quantification of carbon nanotube interconnects

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Krishna Prasad ◽  
Sourajeet Roy
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Nanotube ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Polynomial Chaos ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty

Uncertainty Quantification of an Explicitly Coupled Multiphysics Simulation of In-Situ Pyrolysis by Radio Frequency Heating in Oil Shale

SPE Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (03) ◽  
pp. 1443-1461
Author(s):  
Travis Ramsay
Keyword(s):  
Radio Frequency ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Oil Shale ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Polynomial Chaos ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Rf Heating ◽  
Commercial Development ◽  
Mc Simulation

Summary In-situ pyrolysis provides an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technique for exploiting oil and gas from oil shale by converting in-place solid kerogen into liquid oil and gas. Radio-frequency (RF) heating of the in-place oil shale has previously been proposed as a method by which the electromagnetic energy gets converted to thermal energy, thereby heating in-situ kerogen so that it converts to oil and gas. In order to numerically model the RF heating of the in-situ oil shale, a novel explicitly coupled thermal, phase field, mechanical, and electromagnetic (TPME) framework is devised using the finite element method in a 2D domain. Contemporaneous efforts in the commercial development of oil shale by in-situ pyrolysis have largely focused on pilot methodologies intended to validate specific corporate or esoteric EOR strategies. This work focuses on addressing efficient epistemic uncertainty quantification (UQ) of select thermal, oil shale distribution, electromagnetic, and mechanical characteristics of oil shale in the RF heating process, comparing a spectral methodology to a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for validation. Attempts were made to parameterize the stochastic simulation models using the characteristic properties of Green River oil shale. The geologic environment being investigated is devised as a kerogen-poor under- and overburden separated by a layer of heterogeneous yet kerogen-rich oil shale in a target formation. The objective of this work is the quantification of plausible oil shale conversion using TPME simulation under parametric uncertainty; this, while considering a referenced conversion timeline of 1.0 × 107 seconds. Nonintrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC) and MC simulation were used to evaluate complex stochastically driven TPME simulations of RF heating. The least angle regression (LAR) method was specifically used to determine a sparse set of polynomial chaos coefficients leading to the determination of summary statistics that describe the TPME results. Given the existing broad use of MC simulation methods for UQ in the oil and gas industry, the combined LAR and NIPC is suggested to provide a distinguishable performance improvement to UQ compared to MC methods.

Uncertainty Quantification and Missing Data for Turbomachinery With Probabilistic Equivalence and Arbitrary Polynomial Chaos, Applied to Scroll Compressors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Pepper ◽  
Francesco Montomoli ◽  
Sanjiv Sharma ◽  
Francesco Giacomel ◽  
Michele Pinelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Uncertainty Quantification ◽  
Polynomial Chaos ◽  
Arbitrary Polynomial

Comparative Analysis of Methodologies for Uncertainty Propagation and Quantification

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Cuneo ◽  
Alberto Traverso ◽  
Shahrokh Shahpar
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Design ◽  
Polynomial Chaos ◽  
Epistemic Uncertainty ◽  
Uncertainty Propagation ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Computational Effort ◽  
Optimization Under Uncertainty ◽  
Design Parameters ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Aleatory And Epistemic Uncertainty

In engineering design, uncertainty is inevitable and can cause a significant deviation in the performance of a system. Uncertainty in input parameters can be categorized into two groups: aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. The work presented here is focused on aleatory uncertainty, which can cause natural, unpredictable and uncontrollable variations in performance of the system under study. Such uncertainty can be quantified using statistical methods, but the main obstacle is often the computational cost, because the representative model is typically highly non-linear and complex. Therefore, it is necessary to have a robust tool that can perform the uncertainty propagation with as few evaluations as possible. In the last few years, different methodologies for uncertainty propagation and quantification have been proposed. The focus of this study is to evaluate four different methods to demonstrate strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The first method considered is Monte Carlo simulation, a sampling method that can give high accuracy but needs a relatively large computational effort. The second method is Polynomial Chaos, an approximated method where the probabilistic parameters of the response function are modelled with orthogonal polynomials. The third method considered is Mid-range Approximation Method. This approach is based on the assembly of multiple meta-models into one model to perform optimization under uncertainty. The fourth method is the application of the first two methods not directly to the model but to a response surface representing the model of the simulation, to decrease computational cost. All these methods have been applied to a set of analytical test functions and engineering test cases. Relevant aspects of the engineering design and analysis such as high number of stochastic variables and optimised design problem with and without stochastic design parameters were assessed. Polynomial Chaos emerges as the most promising methodology, and was then applied to a turbomachinery test case based on a thermal analysis of a high-pressure turbine disk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document