Tips on Scientific Writing and Manuscript Preparation [Continuing Education]

IEEE Pulse ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 58-60
Author(s):  
Christian A. Linte
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S223-S224
Author(s):  
Suzanne Meeks

Abstract In this section of the symposium, I will talk about manuscript preparation for maximizing the likelihood that your work will be sent for review. I will talk about common author errors that usually guarantee an immediate reject decision such as not reading and following the Instructions to Authors. I will emphasize the importance of plain, good writing. Editors of high impact journals receive 10 or more new manuscripts per week, and due to limited page space, have to reject 80-90% of them. Regardless of scholarly quality, if the point and contribution are not clear in a quick scan of the paper, it likely will not be reviewed favorably. I will provide tips for strong scientific writing that are commonly violated in manuscript submissions, and provide references for additional writing support.


2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos A. Muñoz-Viveros ◽  
W. Patrick Naylor

Abstract Revised on 12/10/04 for The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice The purpose of this article is to provide potential authors with a contemporary guide to scientific writing. It is in essence a handbook that covers the planning for a scientific publication from inception of the project or study to manuscript preparation and, ultimately, acceptance by a journal. Major topics such as manuscript formatting, data analysis, use of charts, graphs and images, reference formats, and manuscript submission are presented. Citation Naylor WP, Muñoz-Viveros CA. The Art of Scientific Writing: How to Get Your Research Published! J Contemp Dent Pract 2005 May;(6)2:164-180.


2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-3
Author(s):  
Elaine Ledwon-Robinson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document