The effect of femoral component external rotation on tibial rotation in total knee arthroplasty

AbstractProper femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important, given the prognostic impact of a poorly positioned component. The purpose of this observational study was to determine the incidence of femoral component malrotation using posterior condylar axis (PCA) referencing. A total of 100 knees in 92 patients with varus gonarthritis of the knee undergoing primary TKA using a standard medial parapatellar approach were evaluated intraoperatively. After distal femoral resection, the standard femoral sizing guide referencing the posterior condylar axis was used to set femoral component rotation. This was then compared with both the transepicondylar (TEA) and trochlear anteroposterior axes (TRAx). Disparites were recorded and corrected in line with the epicondylar axis. Rotational adjustment for addition of further external rotation was made in 13 (13.0%) cases. In seven cases, the medial pin sites were raised between 1 and 3 mm, and in six cases, the lateral pin site was lowered between 1 and 3 mm (based on risk of notching the femoral cortex). It is critical to not rely exclusively on the PCA to confirm rotational positioning of the femoral component as predicted by posterior condylar referencing guides. Intraoperative adjustment and confirmation using the TEA and TRAx occurred in 13% of primary TKA cases, which might have, otherwise, had a significant effect on the clinical outcome.

Download Full-text

External rotation of the femoral component decreases patellofemoral contact stress in total knee arthroplasty

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy ◽

10.1007/s00167-014-3103-5 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 23 (11) ◽

pp. 3266-3272 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Takashi Terashima ◽

Tomohiro Onodera ◽

Naohiro Sawaguchi ◽

Yasuhiko Kasahara ◽

Tokifumi Majima

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Contact Stress ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

External Rotation ◽

Total Knee

Download Full-text

ROTATIONAL ALIGNMENT OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR VARUS OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE; A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

10.36106/ijar/4914205 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 46-48

Author(s):

Pooyan Jalalpour ◽

Mohammadreza Minator Sajadi ◽

Seyed Amirali Matini ◽

Kamyar Makvandi

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Retrospective Study ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

External Rotation ◽

Rotational Alignment ◽

P Value ◽

Osteoarthritis Of The Knee ◽

Posterior Condylar ◽

Total Knee

Background and Aims: Achieving proper axial rotational alignment of the femoral component for varus knees is a critical step in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Trans epicondylar axis (TEA) is the most reliable reference for alignment of femoral component. Yet, nding the exact location is sometimes difcult and time consuming. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the TEA and posterior condylar line reference (PCL) in varus knees. Besides, the other aim of this study was to nd the relationship between lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and femoral component external rotation (ER) measured intraoperatively. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on patients who were candidates for total knee arthroplasty from May 2016 to December 2019. LDFA, VA were calculated based on hip-to-ankle (HTA) radiographs before the surgery. All patients underwent TKA through an anterior midline incision. ER was calculated by determining TEA intraoperatively. All data were entered into SPSS software for data analysis. Results: One hundred and four patients were included in the nal analysis. Nineteen patients (18.3%) were male and 85 out of 104 (81.7%) were female. (P value = 0.001). No signicant relationship between the amount of ER measured during surgery and the amount of varus angle in varus knees was observed. Furthermore, there were no correlations between ER and LDFA in varus knees. Conclusion: Adjusting femoral component in 3 degrees external rotation relative to posterior condylar line reference achieves proper rotational alignment of the femoral component in the axial plane in varus knees. Also, the lateral distal femoral angle measured preoperatively from knee radiographs is not a predictor of ER in varus knees

Download Full-text

Femoral component external rotation in total knee arthroplasty

The Knee ◽

10.1016/0968-0160(96)85090-3 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 3 (3) ◽

pp. 172

Author(s):

Michael D. Ries

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

External Rotation ◽

Total Knee

Download Full-text

Isolated Liner Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty Instability: A Road That Should Remain Less Taken

The Journal of Knee Surgery ◽

10.1055/s-0040-1721091 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Jason D. Tegethoff ◽

Rafael Walker-Santiago ◽

William M. Ralston ◽

James A. Keeney

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Femoral Component ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

P Value ◽

Surgical Morbidity ◽

Exact Test ◽

Total Knee ◽

Component Revision

AbstractIsolated polyethylene liner exchange (IPLE) is infrequently selected as a treatment approach for patients with primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthetic joint instability. Potential advantages of less immediate surgical morbidity, faster recovery, and lower procedural cost need to be measured against reoperation and re-revision risk. Few published studies have directly compared IPLE with combined tibial and femoral component revision to treat patients with primary TKA instability. After obtaining institutional review board (IRB) approval, we performed a retrospective comparison of 20 patients treated with IPLE and 126 patients treated with tibial and femoral component revisions at a single institution between 2011 and 2018. Patient demographic characteristics, medical comorbidities, time to initial revision TKA, and reoperation (90 days, <2 years, and >2 years) were assessed using paired Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test with a p-value <0.01 used to determine significance. Patients undergoing IPLE were more likely to undergo reoperation (60.0 vs. 17.5%, p = 0.001), component revision surgery (45.0 vs. 8.7%, p = 0.002), and component revision within 2 years (30.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.0001). Differences in 90-day reoperation (p = 0.14) and revision >2 years (p = 0.19) were not significant. Reoperation for instability (30.0 vs. 4.0%, p < 0.001) and infection (20.0 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.01) were both higher in the IPLE group. IPLE does not provide consistent benefits for patients undergoing TKA revision for instability. Considerations for lower immediate postoperative morbidity and cost need to be carefully measured against long-term consequences of reoperation, delayed component revision, and increased long-term costs of multiple surgical procedures. This is a level III, case–control study.

Download Full-text