As the Army prepares to move into the next century, it is exploring advances in technology that will enable U.S. military forces to obtain more complete data regarding its mission, enemy and friendly troop locations, weather, and target status. Not only will this data be more accurate, it will be collected and transmitted in near real-time. Advanced displays must be developed that allow commanders to efficiently deal with large volumes of data so that effective decisions can be made in a timely manner. This paper describes an experiment comparing three methods of displaying battlefield resources and unit mobility: (1) a combination of alphanumerics and standard Army decision graphics, (2) a configural display (CD) representation, and (3) an associative configural display representation (ACD). Results indicate that performance benefits are realized from both the CD and ACD representations, but the CD proved to be the best overall.