Handling Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems via Bidirectional Coevolution

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Zhi-Zhong Liu ◽  
Bing-Chuan Wang ◽  
Ke Tang
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

An improved proximal method with quasi-distance for nonconvex multiobjective optimization problem

2022 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fouzia Amir ◽  
Ali Farajzadeh ◽  
Jehad Alzabut
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Convergence Result ◽  
Proximal Method ◽  
Pareto Solution ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Locally Lipschitz ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Abstract Multiobjective optimization is the optimization with several conflicting objective functions. However, it is generally tough to find an optimal solution that satisfies all objectives from a mathematical frame of reference. The main objective of this article is to present an improved proximal method involving quasi-distance for constrained multiobjective optimization problems under the locally Lipschitz condition of the cost function. An instigation to study the proximal method with quasi distances is due to its widespread applications of the quasi distances in computer theory. To study the convergence result, Fritz John’s necessary optimality condition for weak Pareto solution is used. The suitable conditions to guarantee that the cluster points of the generated sequences are Pareto–Clarke critical points are provided.

A Particle Swarm Optimizer for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

2015 ◽  
pp. 1246-1276
Author(s):  
Wen Fung Leong ◽  
Yali Wu ◽  
Gary G. Yen
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Feasible Solutions ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Generally, constraint-handling techniques are designed for evolutionary algorithms to solve Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems (CMOPs). Most Multiojective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) designs adopt these existing constraint-handling techniques to deal with CMOPs. In this chapter, the authors present a constrained MOPSO in which the information related to particles' infeasibility and feasibility status is utilized effectively to guide the particles to search for feasible solutions and to improve the quality of the optimal solution found. The updating of personal best archive is based on the particles' Pareto ranks and their constraint violations. The infeasible global best archive is adopted to store infeasible nondominated solutions. The acceleration constants are adjusted depending on the personal bests' and selected global bests' infeasibility and feasibility statuses. The personal bests' feasibility statuses are integrated to estimate the mutation rate in the mutation procedure. The simulation results indicate that the proposed constrained MOPSO is highly competitive in solving selected benchmark problems.

A Particle Swarm Optimizer for Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

2015 ◽  
pp. 128-159
Author(s):  
Wen Fung Leong ◽  
Yali Wu ◽  
Gary G. Yen
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm ◽  
Optimal Solution ◽  
Constraint Handling ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Particle Swarm Optimizer ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Feasible Solutions ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Generally, constraint-handling techniques are designed for evolutionary algorithms to solve Constrained Multiobjective Optimization Problems (CMOPs). Most Multiojective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) designs adopt these existing constraint-handling techniques to deal with CMOPs. In this chapter, the authors present a constrained MOPSO in which the information related to particles' infeasibility and feasibility status is utilized effectively to guide the particles to search for feasible solutions and to improve the quality of the optimal solution found. The updating of personal best archive is based on the particles' Pareto ranks and their constraint violations. The infeasible global best archive is adopted to store infeasible nondominated solutions. The acceleration constants are adjusted depending on the personal bests' and selected global bests' infeasibility and feasibility statuses. The personal bests' feasibility statuses are integrated to estimate the mutation rate in the mutation procedure. The simulation results indicate that the proposed constrained MOPSO is highly competitive in solving selected benchmark problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document