scholarly journals Influences of Two-Scale Roughness Parameters on the Ocean Surface Emissivity From Satellite Passive Microwave Measurements

Author(s):  
Sang-Moo Lee ◽  
Albin J. Gasiewski ◽  
Byung-Ju Sohn
Author(s):  
Sang-Moo Lee ◽  
Byung-Ju Sohn

AbstractWidely used FAST Microwave Ocean Surface Emissivity Model (FASTEM) does not include the interaction between small-scale and large-scale roughness, which seems to induce errors in the ocean surface emissivity estimation. In this study, we attempt to develop a new model that might be included in the FASTEM-like model. In the developed model, the large-scale roughness is expressed as a function of the local incidence angle (LIA) within the context of Fresnel reflection theory, incorporating the interactions between the small-scale and large-scale roughness into the fast ocean surface emissivity model, as done in the two-scale approach. With the new expression of the large-scale roughness, we also provide a more physically-based form of the equation for the fast ocean surface emissivity calculation that includes the small-scale scattering over a geometrically rough surface. In addition, an algorithm for estimating two-scale roughness from the measured or modeled polarized emissivities in conjunction with the proposed fast ocean surface emissivity equation is provided. The results demonstrate that the interactions between two-scale roughness should be considered in order to estimate accurate two-scale roughness influences on the ocean surface emissivity.


1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 163-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Wilheit ◽  
R. Adler ◽  
S. Avery ◽  
E. Barrett ◽  
P. Bauer ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. vzj2012.0134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naira Chaouch ◽  
Robert Leconte ◽  
Ramata Magagi ◽  
Marouane Temimi ◽  
Reza Khanbilvardi

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.D. Sandlin ◽  
L.A. Rose ◽  
G.L. Geernaert ◽  
J.P. Hollinger ◽  
F.A. Hansen

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Sturm ◽  
Thomas C. Grenfell ◽  
Donald K. Perovich

The microwave emissivity of two snow covers was measured in Alaska in March, 1990. Observations were made on taiga snow near Fairbanks that was 0.83 m thick with a 0.55 m thick basal layer of depth hoar. Other measurements were made on the tundra snow cover at Imnaviat Creek north of the Brooks Range which was 0.27 to 0.64 m thick and consisted of two or more wind slabs overlying a depth hoar layer 0.14 to 0.26 m thick. Density, crystal structure, and grain size were similar in tundra and taiga depth hoar layers.Emissivity was measured at 18.7 and 37 GHz using radiometers mounted on a 1.5 m tall bipod. Measurements were made on undisturbed snow, and then several snow layers were removed and additional measurements were made. This sequence was repeated until all snow had been removed. Effective emissivity values for the full snow depth ranged from 0.6 (37 GHz, H-pol) to 0.95 (18.7 GHz, V-pol) and were similar for both taiga and tundra snow covers. For both snow covers, there was a marked reduction in the effective emissivity (eeff) from that of the underlying ground with a maximum reduction of about 30%. All of the reduction was found to occur within the depth hoar layer. Maximum reduction in eeffcould be caused by a depth hoar layer 0.3 m thick. Overlying wind slab or new snow were nearly “invisible”, increasing the effective emissivity only by a small amount due to self-emittance. Thus, it was difficult to distinguish the two different snow covers on the basis of their emissivity, since both contained 0.3 m of depth hoar or more.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document