land surface
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12450
(FIVE YEARS 6307)

H-INDEX

188
(FIVE YEARS 52)

2022 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 104105
Author(s):  
Min-Lung Cheng ◽  
Masashi Matsuoka ◽  
Wen Liu ◽  
Fumio Yamazaki

2022 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 103804
Author(s):  
Issam Touhami ◽  
Hassane Moutahir ◽  
Dorsaf Assoul ◽  
Kaouther Bergaoui ◽  
Hamdi Aouinti ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Malone ◽  
John Craddock ◽  
Alexandra Wallenberg ◽  
Betrand Gaschot ◽  
John A. Luczaj

ABSTRACT Rattlesnake Mountain is a Laramide uplift cored by Archean gneiss that formed by offset along two reverse faults with opposing dips, the result being an asymmetric anticline with a drape fold of Cambrian–Cretaceous sediments. Rattlesnake Mountain was uplifted ca. 57 Ma and was a structural buttress that impeded motion of upper-plate blocks of the catastrophic Heart Mountain slide (49.19 Ma). North of Pat O’Hara Mountain anticline, Rattlesnake Mountain anticline has a central graben that formed ca. 52 Ma (U-Pb age on vein calcite in normal faults) into which O- and C-depleted fluids propagated upward with hydrocarbons. The graben is defined by down-dropped Triassic Chugwater shales atop the anticline that facilitated motion of Heart Mountain slide blocks of Paleozoic limestones dolomite (i.e., the Ordovician Bighorn Dolomite and Mississippian Madison Limestone) onto, and over, Rattlesnake Mountain into the Bighorn Basin. Heart Mountain fault gouge was also injected downward into the bounding Rattlesnake Mountain graben normal faults (U-Pb age ca. 48.8 ± 5 Ma), based on O and C isotopes; there is no anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility fabric present. Calcite veins parallel to graben normal faults precipitated from meteoric waters (recorded by O and C isotopes) heated by the uplifting Rattlesnake Mountain anticline and crystallized at 57 °C (fluid inclusions) in the presence of oil. Calcite twinning strain results from graben injectites and calcite veins are different; we also documented a random layer-parallel shortening strain pattern for the Heart Mountain slide blocks in the ramp region (n = 4; west) and on the land surface (n = 5; atop Rattlesnake Mountain). We observed an absence of any twinning strain overprint (low negative expected values) in the allochthonous upper-plate blocks and in autochthonous carbonates directly below the Heart Mountain slide surface, again indicating rapid motion including horizontal rotation about vertical axes of the upper-plate Heart Mountain slide blocks during the Eocene.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document