Wheres My Button Evaluating the User Experience of Surface Haptics in Featureless Automotive User Interfaces.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Stefan Josef Breitschaft ◽  
Alexander Pastukhov ◽  
Claus-Christian Carbon
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Florian Roider

Driving a modern car is more than just maneuvering the vehicle on the road. At the same time, drivers want to listen to music, operate the navigation system, compose, and read messages and more. Future cars are turning from simple means for transportation into smart devices on wheels. This trend will continue in the next years together with the advent of automated vehicles. However, technical challenges, legal regulations, and high costs slow down the penetration of automated vehicles. For this reason, a great majority of people will still be driving manually at least for the next decade. Consequently, it must be ensured that all the features of novel infotainment systems can be used easily, efficiently without distracting the driver from the task of driving and still provide a high user experience. A promising approach to cope with this challenge is multimodal in-car interaction. Multimodal interaction basically describes the combination of different input and output modalities for driver-vehicle interaction. Research has pointed out the potential to create a more flexible, efficient, and robust interaction. In addition to that, the integration of natural interaction modalities such as speech, gestures and gaze, the communication with the car could increase the naturalness of the interaction. Based on these advantages, the researcher community in the field of automotive user interfaces has produced several interesting concepts for multimodal interaction in vehicles. The problem is that the resulting insights and recommendations are often easily applicable in the design process of other concepts because they too concrete or very abstract. At the same time, concepts focus on different aspects. Some aim to reduce distraction while others want to increase efficiency or provide a better user experience. This makes it difficult to give overarching recommendations on how to combine natural input modalities while driving. As a consequence, interaction designers of in-vehicle systems are lacking adequate design support that enables them to transfer existing knowledge about the design of multimodal in-vehicle applications to their own concepts. This thesis addresses this gap by providing empirically validated design support for multimodal in-vehicle applications. It starts with a review of existing design support for automotive and multimodal applications. Based on that we report a series of user experiments that investigate various aspects of multimodal in-vehicle interaction with more than 200 participants in lab setups and driving simulators. During these experiments, we assessed the potentials of multimodality while driving, explored how user interfaces can support speech and gestures, and evaluated novel interaction techniques. The insights from these experiments extend existing knowledge from literature in order to create the first pattern collection for multimodal natural in-vehicle interaction. The collection contains 15 patterns that describe solutions for reoccurring problems when combining natural input with speech, gestures, or gaze in the car in a structured way. Finally, we present a prototype of an in-vehicle information system, which demonstrates the application of the proposed patterns and evaluate it in a driving-simulator experiment. This work contributes to field of automotive user interfaces in three ways. First, it presents the first pattern collection for multimodal natural in-vehicle interaction. Second, it illustrates and evaluates interaction techniques that combine speech and gestures with gaze input. Third, it provides empirical results of a series of user experiments that show the effects of multimodal natural interaction on different factors such as driving performance, glance behavior, interaction efficiency, and user experience.


Author(s):  
Stefan Diewald ◽  
Andreas Möller ◽  
Tobias Stockinger ◽  
Luis Roalter ◽  
Marion Koelle ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jan Willem Streefkerk ◽  
Myra P. van Esch-Bussemakers ◽  
Mark A. Neerincx ◽  
Rosemarijn Looije

Evaluation refines and validates design solutions in order to establish adequate user experiences. For mobile user interfaces in dynamic and critical environments, user experiences can vary enormously, setting high requirements for evaluation. This chapter presents a framework for the selection, combination, and tuning of evaluation methods. It identifies seven evaluation constraints, that is, the development stage, the complexity of the design, the purpose, participants, setting, duration, and cost of evaluation, which influence the appropriateness of the method. Using a combination of methods in different settings (such as Wizard-of-Oz, game-based, and field evaluations) a concise, complete, and coherent set of user experience data can be gathered, such as performance, situation awareness, trust, and acceptance. Applying this framework to a case study on context-aware mobile interfaces for the police resulted in specific guidelines for selecting evaluation methods and succeeded to capture the mobile context and its relation to the user experience.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Sebastian Lorenz ◽  
Jens R. Helmert ◽  
Ruben Anders ◽  
Christian Wölfel ◽  
Jens Krzywinski

With the evaluation of a next-generation human–machine interface (HMI) concept for excavators, this study aims to discuss the HMI quality measurement based on usability and user experience (UUX) metrics. Regarding the digital transformation of construction sites, future work environments will have to be capable of presenting various complex visual data and enabling efficient and safe interactivity while working. The evaluated HMI focused on introducing a touch display-based interface, providing advanced operation functions and different interaction modalities. The assessment of UUX should show whether the novel HMI can be utilised to perform typical tasks (usability) and how it is accepted and assessed in terms of non-instrumental qualities (user experience, UX). Using the collected data, this article also aims to contribute to the general discussion about the role of UX beyond usability in industrial applications and deepen the understanding of non-instrumental qualities when it comes to user-oriented process and machine design. The exploratory study examines insights into the application of elaborated UUX measuring tools like the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) on the interaction with industrial goods accompanied by their rating with other tools, namely System Usability Scale (SUS), Intuitive Interaction Questionnaire (INTUI) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Four goals are pursued in this study. The first goal is to compare in-depth two different ways of interaction with the novel HMI—namely one by a control pad on the right joystick and one by touch. Therefore, a sample of 17 subjects in total was split into two groups and differences in UUX measures were tested. Secondly, the performances of both groups were tested over the course of trials to investigate possible differences in detail. The third goal is to interpret measures of usability and user experience against existing benchmark values. Fourth and finally, we use the data gathered to analyse correlations between measures of UUX. The results of our study show that the different ways of interaction did not impact any of the measures taken. In terms of detailed performance analysis, both groups yielded differences in terms of time per action, but not between the groups. The comparison of UUX measures with benchmark values yielded mixed results. The UUX measures show some relevant significant correlations. The participants mostly reported enjoying the use of the HMI concept, but several practical issues (e.g., efficiency) still need to be overcome. Once again, the study confirms the urge of user inclusion in product development. Especially in the course of digitalisation, as big scale advancements of systems and user interfaces bring uncertainty for many manufacturers regarding whether or how a feature should be integrated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document