scholarly journals Family Firms, Alliance Governance and Mutual Knowledge Creation

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricarda B. Bouncken ◽  
Mathew Hughes ◽  
Martin Ratzmann ◽  
Beate Cesinger ◽  
Robin Pesch
2021 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 422-429
Author(s):  
Ricarda B. Bouncken ◽  
Martin Ratzmann ◽  
Sascha Kraus

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-133
Author(s):  
Piotr Preciuk ◽  
◽  
Ewa Wilczyńska ◽  

Purpose: To explore how the predecessors and successors of Polish family businesses use and refine existing knowledge, identify knowledge deficiencies or absences, and create new knowledge during the working together stage. Methodology/approach: The article builds on qualitative empirical material gathered in 2018 and 2019 with a problem-centered interview approach aiming to capture the complex and potentially diverging realities of both generations. Altogether, 48 preliminary interview questionnaires were completed and, subsequently, 46 interviews were conducted. Findings: The study captured that the use of existing knowledge during the Working Together period is significantly supported by the fact that the old and young generation share several unarticulated beliefs, mental models, and behaviors. However, the identification of knowledge gaps and the creation of new knowledge are heavily hindered by the fear of confrontation and only declarative – instead of active – interest of the older generation in creating new knowledge. Originality/value: The article bridges the gap between the literature on organizational ambidexterity and family business by empirically investigating the intergenerational dynamics of owners’ families regarding knowledge creation. Moreover, we introduce the concept of intergenerational familial ambidexterity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricarda Barbara Bouncken ◽  
Robin Pesch ◽  
Andreas Reuschl

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 77-86
Author(s):  
Hae-Young Ryu ◽  
Soo-Joon Chae
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Orazio Vagnozzi

The existence of a gap between accounting research and accounting practice has been extensively described in literature. In order to be able to publish a research in a high-ranked accounting journal, it seems that methodological issues are more important than those related to the relevance of the topics covered. To improve research and accounting practice and to avoid the risk of accounting research becoming selfreferential, every effort should be made to bridge the current gap between research and accounting practice. To this end, the development of mutual knowledge of the agenda of researchers and practitioners on the one hand, and participation in joint projects on the other, could represent possible future solutions to be pursued.


2012 ◽  
pp. 78-90
Author(s):  
Thang Nguyen Ngoc

Knowledge and the capability to create and utilize knowledge today are consid- ered to be the most important sources of a firm’s sustainable competitive advantage. This paper aims to advance understanding of the knowledge creation of firm in Vietnam by studying Alphanam Company. The case illustrates how knowledge- based management pursues a vision for the future based on ideals that consider the relationships of people in society. The finding shows that the case succeeded because of their flexibility and mobility to keep meeting to the changing needs of the customers or stakeholders. The paper also provided some suggestions for future research to examine knowledge-based management of the companies in a different industry segments and companies originating in other countries


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document