scholarly journals An empirical assessment of common or usual names to label cell‐based seafood products

2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 2267-2277
Author(s):  
William K. Hallman ◽  
William K. Hallman
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William K. Hallman ◽  
William K. Hallman

ABSTRACTUsing an online experiment with a nationally representative sample of 1200 adult American consumers, two “common or usual names,” “Cell-Based Seafood” and “Cell-Cultured Seafood,” were assessed using five criteria. Displayed on packages of frozen Atlantic Salmon, the names were evaluated on their ability to differentiate the novel products from conventionally-produced fish, to identify their potential allergenicity, and after learning its meaning, to be seen by participants as an appropriate term for describing the process for creating the product. In addition, the names were evaluated as to whether they would be interpreted as disparaging of new or existing products, and whether they elicited reactions contrary to the assertion that the products are nutritious, healthy and safe. The results confirmed earlier research showing that “Cell-Based Seafood” slightly outperformed “Cell-Cultured Seafood” as a common or usual name. Labeling products with the term “Cell-Based Seafood” meets important regulatory criteria by enabling consumers to distinguish such products from conventional seafood products, and by indicating the presence of allergens. From a marketing perspective, “Cell-Based” is also viewed as an appropriate term for describing the process for producing the products, meeting the criteria for transparency. Consumers also had more positive reactions to “Cell-Based Seafood” and were slightly more inclined to want to taste and purchase “Cell-Based” products both before and after learning the meaning of “Cell-Based” and “Cell-Cultured.” Therefore, “Cell-Based Seafood” should be adopted as the best common or usual name to label cell-based seafood products.Practical ApplicationWidespread adoption and consistent use of a single “common or usual name” for “Cell-Based” seafood, meat, poultry and other products by the food industry, regulators, journalists, marketers, environmental, consumer, and animal rights advocates, and other key stakeholders would help shape public perceptions and understanding of this rapidly advancing technology and its products. This study confirms that “Cell-Based Seafood” is the best performing term to label seafood products made from the cells of fish. It meets relevant FDA regulatory requirements and slightly outperforms “Cell-Cultured Seafood” with regard to positive consumer perceptions, interest in tasting and likelihood of purchasing these novel products.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Grozman ◽  
Anne Marie D. Haddock ◽  
Lindsey M. Lee ◽  
Lisa S. Moore ◽  
Amy Gammon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Karl Widerquist ◽  
Grant S. McCall

This chapter empirically investigates two hypotheses often used to support the claim that virtually everyone is better off in state society than they could reasonably expect to be in any stateless environment. “The strong violence hypothesis” is the claim that violence in stateless societies is necessarily intolerable. “The weak violence hypothesis” is the claim that violence in stateless societies tends to be higher than in state society. Section 1 uses anthropological and historical evidence to examine violence in prehistoric stateless societies, early states, and contemporary states. Section 2 reviews evidence from modern stateless societies. Section 3 attempts to assemble anthropologists’ consensus view of violence in stateless societies. Section 4 evaluates the strong and weak hypotheses in light of this information, arguing that societies in which sovereignty is most absent maintain the ability to keep violence at tolerable levels. Although it is reasonable to suppose that stateless societies tend to have higher violence than contemporary state societies, some stateless societies have lower violence than some states. Because these findings reject 350 years of accumulated theory of sovereignty, Section 5 briefly discusses how bands are able to maintain peace without state-like institutions. Section 6 concludes.


1989 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 532-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Snow ◽  
Susan G. Baker ◽  
Leon Anderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document