AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF GENERATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN BASIC HUMAN VALUES

2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 339 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEAN T. LYONS
2007 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean T. Lyons ◽  
Linda Duxbury ◽  
Christopher Higgins

This study assessed generational differences in human values as measured by the Schwartz Value Survey. It was proposed that the two most recent generations, Millennials and Generation Xers, would value Sell-enhancement and Openness to Change more than the two older generations, Baby Boomers and Matures, while the two older generations would value Self-transcendence and Conservation more. The hypotheses were tested with a combined sample of Canadian knowledge workers and undergraduate business students ( N = 1,194). Two hypotheses were largely supported, although an unexpectedly large difference was observed between Millennials and Generation Xers with respect to Openness to Change and Self-enhancement. The findings suggest that generation is a useful variable in examining differences in social values.


Author(s):  
Melia K. Stockham ◽  
Mary Lind

Generational differences in the workplace have been the subject of much discussion for the field of management. In many cases, the technology savvy of the youngest generation in the workplace, coined “digital natives,” is the motivation behind organizational decision-making. However, little empirical evidence exists as to whether it is their comfort and confidence using technology that truly sets digital natives apart from their generational predecessors known as “digital immigrants.” Work values, those areas of importance that enhance satisfaction and engagement in the workplace, are rooted in the belief that there is a structure to basic human values. This study connects the theories of work values, generational differences, and computer self-efficacy to investigate if computer self-efficacy interacts with digital native status to influence differences in work values.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Maura G. Marks

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Grozman ◽  
Anne Marie D. Haddock ◽  
Lindsey M. Lee ◽  
Lisa S. Moore ◽  
Amy Gammon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Kelly ◽  
Laura J. Tagliareni ◽  
Pamela F. Foley

2015 ◽  
pp. 5-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Avtonomov

The article asks which human qualities can serve as the base for a liberal economic policy. The author is looking for an answer to this question in the classical works of economic liberalism - in the books by F. Bastiat, L. von Mises, F. von Hayek, W. Eucken, and M. Friedman. The two main qualities can be summarized as follows: the relatively high rank of freedom among human values and rational utilitarian calculus. It is assumed that in those countries where the both human prerequisites are present the liberal policy (for instance, liberal reforms) can be self-supportive and may have good results. On the contrary, if the first prerequisite is missing and a liberal policy can be based only on rational calculus, the “paternalistic” liberalism prevails and chances for success are much smaller.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document