APACHE II score is superior to SOFA, CTP and MELD in predicting the short-term mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF)

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 484-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Duseja ◽  
Narendra S Choudhary ◽  
Sachin Gupta ◽  
Radha Krishan Dhiman ◽  
Yogesh Chawla
2020 ◽  
Vol 148 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 153-159
Author(s):  
Tamara Milovanovic ◽  
Milica Stojkovic-Lalosevic ◽  
Sanja Dragasevic ◽  
Nevena Jocic ◽  
Marko Baralic ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objective. Due to a very high mortality risk, acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients require early identification and intensive treatment. Precise prediction is crucial for determining the urgency degree and therapy appropriateness, considering high mortality and multitude of clinical resources. The aim of our study was to determine the exact cut-off values of various prognostic scores in the prediction of morality of ACLF. Methods. This prospective study includes chronic liver disease (CLD) patients, admitted due to decompensation, that were subsequently diagnosed with ACLF at the Emergency unit. All patients were evaluated based on various prognostic scores, including Child?Pugh, MELD Na, MELD, SOFA, APACHE II, and CLIF C, which were calculated on admission. Results. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) was the most common underlying CLD cause (77.9%), followed by viral (8.6%), autoimmune (7.7%), and other causes (5.8%). A total of 37.5% of the patients died at the end of the first month of treatment. Average values of Child?Pugh, MELD Na, MELD, SOFA, APACHE II, and CLIF C scores were significantly higher in patients who died compared to survivors (p < 0.05). CLIF C score showed the best performance with a cut-off value of 50.5, with a sensitivity of 94.9% and specificity of 40%. Conclusion. ACLF remains a condition with a high short-term mortality. Of all of the scores examined in our study, CLIF C proved to be the best scoring system for predicting short term and end of treatment mortality in patients with ACLF.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Woo Choi ◽  
Jin-Kyu Cho ◽  
Sang Soo Lee ◽  
Jae Heon Kim ◽  
Hankyu Jeon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a widely recognized concept in which acute decompensation (AD) in patients with cirrhosis results in organ failures and high short-term mortality. However, few studies reflecting the various etiologies of cirrhosis are available. We aimed to investigate the clinical features of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related ACLF. Methods Between January 2005 and December 2018, 109 HCV-related cirrhosis patients who were hospitalized for AD (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and/or bacterial infection) were enrolled for ACLF defined by European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). Results ACLF developed in 35 patients (32.1%) on admission. Eight patients had ACLF grade 1, eight had ACLF grade 2, and 19 had ACLF grade 3. The 28-day and 90-day mortality rates were very low (2.7% and 5.4%, respectively) in patients without ACLF and very high (60.0% and 74.3%, respectively) in those with ACLF. In patients with HCV-related ACLF, the prevalence of liver failure was very low (17.1%), whereas that of kidney failure was very high (71.4%) compared to previous studies on hepatitis B virus-related ACLF and alcohol-related ACLF. Compared with all other prognostic scores, Chronic liver failure Consortium Organ Failure score most accurately predicted 90-day mortality, with an area under the receiver operator characteristic of 0.921. Conclusions HCV-related ACLF has unique clinical characteristics that are distinct from hepatitis B virus-related and alcohol-related ACLF. ACLF defined by EASL can be useful in predicting short-term mortality in HCV-related cirrhosis.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge A. López-Velázquez ◽  
Norberto C. Chávez-Tapia ◽  
Guadalupe Ponciano-Rodríguez ◽  
Vicente Sánchez-Valle ◽  
Stephen H. Caldwell ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (41) ◽  
pp. 9205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Yeon Kim ◽  
Chang Wook Kim ◽  
Tae Yeob Kim ◽  
Do Seon Song ◽  
Dong Hyun Sinn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document