Abstract
Introduction
Advances in burn injury knowledge, critical care, and pharmacological developments have increased survival rates among extensive burn patients. Survival now dependents not just on skin coverage, but effective control of SIRS response, metabolic derangement, fluid loss and sepsis. Novel synthetic dermal substitutes create robustness, thickness, and pliability of the skin in addition to an improved aesthetic appearance while; point-of-care autologous skin cell harvesting enhances treatment by amplifying small split-thickness skin samples to produce an autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) to cover a larger burn area. This study reports on two survivors with greater than 90% total body surface area full-thickness burns utilizing a combined treatment of a dermal substitute along with ASCS and traditional burn management strategies.
Methods
Chart review of two patients with >90% burns and inhalation injury after being trapped in a burning vehicle following a traffic collision occurred. Most of the burns in both patients were “leathery” and consistent with full thickness, sparing only the plantar and dorsal aspect of the feet and bilateral small areas of the hip in Patient 1. Patient 2 had fourth-degree burns in some areas of the chest and flank with only the bilateral groin regions and feet spared. The patients were treated with a multi-step process which included using allograft, dermal substitute, and ASCS with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) in place of cultured epidermal autograft to achieve coverage of >90% burns with high meshed ratio.
Results
The dermal substitute was limited to deep burns that penetrated down to fat, muscle, and/or joints. Fluid loss was well controlled by the dermal substitute during initial resuscitation. Post reconstruction, areas covered with the dermal substitute and grafted with autogenous STSG with ASCS exhibited less hypertrophy and contracture bands. The elbow and knee joints showed minimal restriction with passive motion and good skin compliance, but contractures persisted in areas where 4th degree tendon and fascia thermal injury occurred. Areas that showed signs of infection were trimmed or unroofed and allowed to drain while maintaining the remainder of the dermal substitute.
Conclusions
The use of dermal substitutes and ASCS allowed the care team to achieve SIRS control, improved fluid management, enhanced skin coverage, and reduced hospitalization stay. The process experienced in these cases shows promise for future patients with extensive burns. Both patients were able to survive and show improvement during rehabilitation.
Heparin mimetic peptide nanofiber gel promotes regeneration of full thickness burn injury
