An Experimental Investigation of Antisocial Lie‐Telling Among Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders and Typically Developing Children

2017 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 774-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison P. Mugno ◽  
Lindsay C. Malloy ◽  
Daniel A. Waschbusch ◽  
William E. Pelham Jr. ◽  
Victoria Talwar
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreevalsan S. Menon ◽  
K. Krishnamurthy

Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder, collectively referred to as disruptive behavior disorders (DBDs), are prevalent psychiatric disorders in children. Early diagnosis of DBDs is crucial because they can increase the risks of other mental health and substance use disorders without appropriate psychosocial interventions and treatment. However, diagnosing DBDs is challenging as they are often comorbid with other disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, and depression. In this study, a multimodal ensemble three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) deep learning model was used to classify children with DBDs and typically developing children. The study participants included 419 females and 681 males, aged 108–131 months who were enrolled in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study. Children were grouped based on the presence of DBDs (n = 550) and typically developing (n = 550); assessments were based on the scores from the Child Behavior Checklist and on the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-age Children-Present and Lifetime version for DSM-5. The diffusion, structural, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data were used as input data to the 3D CNN. The model achieved 72% accuracy in classifying children with DBDs with 70% sensitivity, 72% specificity, and an F1-score of 70. In addition, the discriminative power of the classifier was investigated by identifying the cortical and subcortical regions primarily involved in the prediction of DBDs using a gradient-weighted class activation mapping method. The classification results were compared with those obtained using the three neuroimaging modalities individually, and a connectome-based graph CNN and a multi-scale recurrent neural network using only the rs-fMRI data.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Vanscoyoc ◽  
Catherine Stanger ◽  
Alan J. Budney ◽  
Jeff D. Thostenson

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaleel Abdul-Adil ◽  
David A. Meyerson ◽  
Corinn Elmore ◽  
A. David Farmer ◽  
Karen Taylor-Crawford

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Polanco ◽  
Marjorine Henriquez ◽  
Kimberly Mantilla ◽  
Perla Corredor ◽  
Jacqueline Rodriguez ◽  
...  

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind H. Baker ◽  
Roberta L. Clanton ◽  
Jack C. Rogers ◽  
Stéphane A. De Brito

Decades of research have shown that youths with disruptive behavior disorders (DBD) are a heterogeneous population. Over the past 20 years, researchers have distinguished youths with DBD as those displaying high (DBD/HCU) versus low (DBD/LCU) callous-unemotional (CU) traits. These traits include flat affect and reduced empathy and remorse, and are associated with more severe, varied, and persistent patterns of antisocial behavior and aggression. Conduct problems in youths with HCU and LCU are thought to reflect distinct causal vulnerabilities, with antisocial behavior in youths with DBD/HCU reflecting a predominantly genetic etiology, while antisocial behavior in youths with DBD/LCU is associated primarily with environmental influences. Here we selectively review recent functional (fMRI) and structural (sMRI) magnetic resonance imaging research on DBD, focusing particularly on the role of CU traits. First, fMRI studies examining the neural correlates of affective stimuli, emotional face processing, empathy, theory of mind, morality, and decision-making in DBD are discussed. This is followed by a review of the studies investigating brain structure and structural connectivity in DBD. Next, we highlight the need to further investigate females and the role of sex differences in this population. We conclude the review by identifying potential clinical implications of this research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document