scholarly journals Enamel matrix derivative promotes new bone formation in xenograft assisted maxillary anterior ridge preservation – a randomized controlled clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faustino Mercado ◽  
Cedryck Vaquette ◽  
Stephen Hamlet ◽  
Saso Ivanovski
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Enamel Matrix Derivative ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Enamel Matrix ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Matrix Derivative

scholarly journals Healing of intrabony defects following regenerative surgery by means of single-flap approach in conjunction with either hyaluronic acid or an enamel matrix derivative: a 24-month randomized controlled clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Pilloni ◽  
Mariana A. Rojas ◽  
Lorenzo Marini ◽  
Paola Russo ◽  
Yoshinori Shirakata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Enamel Matrix Derivative ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Enamel Matrix ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Intrabony Defects ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Matrix Derivative

Abstract Objectives The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the clinical outcomes obtained in intrabony defects following regenerative periodontal surgery using the single-flap approach (SFA) in conjunction with either hyaluronic acid (HA) or enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Materials and methods Thirty-two intrabony defects in 32 healthy subjects were randomly assigned: HA (test group) or EMD (control group). Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), gingival recession (REC), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at baseline,12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Results At 24 months, both treatments resulted in statistically significant clinical improvements evidenced by PD-reduction and CAL-gain (p<0.001). The mean CAL-gain was 2.19±1.11 mm in the test and 2.94±1.12 mm in the control sites (p=0.067). PD-reduction was statistically significantly higher for the control group (4.5±0.97 mm) than the test group (3.31±0.70 mm), (p=0.001). CAL-gain ≤ 3 mm was observed in 87.5% and in 62.5% of the test and control sites, respectively. Test sites showed slightly lower REC values than the control sites. No statistically significant differences were found for BOP between treatments. Conclusions The present findings indicate that both treatments led to statistically significant clinical improvements compared to baseline, although the application of EMD resulted in statistically significantly higher PD-reduction compared to the use of HA. Clinical relevance The use of HA in conjunction with a SFA resulted in significant PD-reduction and CAL-gain, pointing to the potential clinical relevance of this material in regenerative periodontal surgery.

Effects of enamel matrix derivative on clinical and inflammatory outcomes in periodontal maintenance patients: Randomized controlled clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (11) ◽  
pp. 1400-1408
Author(s):  
Erica E. Jasa ◽  
Jessica M. Gradoville ◽  
Mary M. Christiansen ◽  
Kaeli K. Samson ◽  
Richard A. Reinhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Enamel Matrix Derivative ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Enamel Matrix ◽  
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Periodontal Maintenance ◽  
Matrix Derivative
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document