Post‐Treatment Head and Neck Cancer Care: National Audit and Analysis of Current Practice in the United Kingdom

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 284-294
Author(s):  
◽  
Matthew Ellis ◽  
George Garas ◽  
John Hardman ◽  
Maha Khan ◽  
...  
Oral Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin W.G. Roe ◽  
Paul N. Carding ◽  
Peter H. Rhys-Evans ◽  
Kate L. Newbold ◽  
Kevin J. Harrington ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S2) ◽  
pp. S3-S4 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Paleri ◽  
N Roland

AbstractThis is the 5th edition of the UK Multi-Disciplinary Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer, endorsed by seven national specialty associations involved in head and neck cancer care. Our aim is to provide a document can be used as a ready reference for multidisciplinary teams and a concise easy read for trainees. All evidence based recommendations in this edition are indicated by ‘(R)’ and where the multidisciplinary team of authors consider a recommendation to be based on clinical experience, it is denoted by ‘(G)’ as a good practice point.


2002 ◽  
Vol 116 (11) ◽  
pp. 937-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Paleri ◽  
R. G. Wight

Co-existent comorbidity is a major determinant of treatment outcome in head and neck cancer. Most of the work pertaining to this topic has been done in the United States, where the standard practice is for trained cancer registrars to grade comorbidity using validated indexes by retrospective notes review. The adult comorbidity evaluation – 27 index (ACE-27) is a validated instrument that has been widely used in head and neck cancer. Although the required clinical data may be available in the notes, a significant amount of historical information is required to grade comorbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and inter-rater reliability of the retrospective notes review process, in a typical setting in the United Kingdom (UK), by comparing the information obtained on notes review alone by a physician to that available after a structured patient interview. The study concludes that the retrospective notes review is an accurate and reliable technique for grading comorbidity whose completeness can be improved by the use of patient questionnaire as part of a structured interview.


2016 ◽  
Vol 130 (S2) ◽  
pp. S5-S8 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Stafford ◽  
K Ah-See ◽  
M Fardy ◽  
K Fell

AbstractThis is the official guideline endorsed by the surgical specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. This paper summarises the current state of play in the organisation and provision of head and neck cancer surgical services in the UK.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document