scholarly journals Moisture‐associated skin damage (MASD): A best practice recommendation from Wund‐D.A.CH.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Dissemond ◽  
Bernd Assenheimer ◽  
Veronika Gerber ◽  
Marianne Hintner ◽  
Magareta Jukic Puntigam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Skin Damage ◽  
Practice Recommendation

Mobile ID device best practice recommendation version 1.0

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Orandi ◽  
R Michael McCabe
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendation

Danger of viscous gel anesthetic use prior to povidone–iodine antisepsis: Best practice recommendation

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 2333-2335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Schroeder ◽  
Megan R. Silas ◽  
Richard M. Thomson ◽  
William G. Myers
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Povidone Iodine ◽  
Practice Recommendation

scholarly journals Cervical collars and immobilisation: A South African best practice recommendation

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Stanton ◽  
T. Hardcastle ◽  
D. Muhlbauer ◽  
D. van Zyl
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendation

scholarly journals Contactless Fingerprint Capture and Data Interchange Best Practice Recommendation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahram Orandi ◽  
Craig Watson ◽  
John M. Libert ◽  
Gregory P. Fiumara ◽  
John D. Grantham
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Data Interchange ◽  
Practice Recommendation

scholarly journals Mobile ID Device Best Practice Recommendation Version 2.1

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin C. Mangold
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendation

scholarly journals Mobile ID Device Best Practice Recommendation Version 2.0

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradford J. Wing
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Practice Recommendation ◽  
Version 2.0

The Use of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises in the Treatment of Children With Cleft Palate: A Re-Examination of Available Evidence

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1811-1820
Author(s):  
Dennis M. Ruscello ◽  
Linda D. Vallino
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Communication Disorders ◽  
Speech Errors ◽  
Clinical Population ◽  
Adjunct Treatment ◽  
Oral Motor ◽  
Practice Recommendation ◽  
Oral Motor Exercises

Purpose The purpose of this tutorial is to re-examine the current literature on nonspeech oral motor exercise (NSOME) in general and its use in the treatment of children with cleft palate specifically and provide a best practice recommendation. Method The Population Intervention Comparison Outcome process was used to investigate the clinical question. This systematic framework identifies the clinical population, evaluates the intervention(s) applied to the population, assesses the results of interventions, and delineates the outcome. A literature search, which examined developmental research, applied clinical research, and systematic treatment reviews, was conducted for this purpose. Results The literature reviewed herein suggests that, on a number of different levels, the implementation of NSOME s does not result in positive communication outcomes for children with cleft palate who present with velopharyngeal dysfunction or compensatory speech errors. Conclusion Based on the current review, there is no empirical support for the use of NSOME as a direct or adjunct treatment for velopharyngeal dysfunction or compensatory speech errors. Appropriate treatments for these communication disorders include surgical, dental, and speech-based interventions.

Meeting the Best Practice for Hearing Aid Verification in Children: Challenges and Future Directions

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 877-894
Author(s):  
Nur Azyani Amri ◽  
Tian Kar Quar ◽  
Foong Yen Chong
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Klang Valley ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Fitting Hearing Aids

Purpose This study examined the current pediatric amplification practice with an emphasis on hearing aid verification using probe microphone measurement (PMM), among audiologists in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Frequency of practice, access to PMM system, practiced protocols, barriers, and perception toward the benefits of PMM were identified through a survey. Method A questionnaire was distributed to and filled in by the audiologists who provided pediatric amplification service in Klang Valley, Malaysia. One hundred eight ( N = 108) audiologists, composed of 90.3% women and 9.7% men (age range: 23–48 years), participated in the survey. Results PMM was not a clinical routine practiced by a majority of the audiologists, despite its recognition as the best clinical practice that should be incorporated into protocols for fitting hearing aids in children. Variations in practice existed warranting further steps to improve the current practice for children with hearing impairment. The lack of access to PMM equipment was 1 major barrier for the audiologists to practice real-ear verification. Practitioners' characteristics such as time constraints, low confidence, and knowledge levels were also identified as barriers that impede the uptake of the evidence-based practice. Conclusions The implementation of PMM in clinical practice remains a challenge to the audiology profession. A knowledge-transfer approach that takes into consideration the barriers and involves effective collaboration or engagement between the knowledge providers and potential stakeholders is required to promote the clinical application of evidence-based best practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document