Rare case of colorectal traditional serrated adenoma mimicking a subepithelial lesion

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 208-208
Author(s):  
Takashi Murakami ◽  
Akihito Nagahara ◽  
Takashi Yao
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Ageykina ◽  
N Oleynikova ◽  
P Malkov ◽  
E Fedorov ◽  
N Danilova ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-556
Author(s):  
Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari ◽  
Stefano Serra ◽  
Richard Colling ◽  
Lai Mun Wang ◽  
Runjan Chetty

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 810-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia-Huei Tsai ◽  
Chien-Hsuan Cheng ◽  
Chien-Chuan Chen ◽  
Yu-Lin Lin ◽  
Liang-In Lin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1094-1096
Author(s):  
Rish K. Pai ◽  
Carole Macaron ◽  
Carol A. Burke

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Kyoo Park ◽  
Woo Jin Jeong ◽  
Gab Jin Cheon

Serrated polyps are classified into 3 distinct types: hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma, or transitional serrated adenoma. A serrated adenoma is a precursor lesion for colorectal carcinoma. Serrated polyps are commonly found in the colorectum but have rarely been described in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. Serrated adenomas in the small intestine may represent aggressive lesions with high malignant potential, according to some reports. A 66-year-old man with no significant medical history underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for general examination. He had a 1-cm sized, Yamada type IV polyp, with focal white patch in the second portion of the duodenum. The biopsy result revealed gastric metaplasia and chronic inflammation. He wanted regular follow -up examinations. The follow-up EGDs were done every year. There were no changes in the shape and size of the polyp. The pathologic findings were unchanged. Then, he underwent EGD for general medical check-up again 5 years after the first detection. The size of the polyp was slightly increased. The biopsy result revealed serrated polyp, unclassified. Endoscopic mucosal resection was done. The pathologic result revealed a 0.8 × 0.5-cm sized, well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. Carcinomas are multifocally spread on the traditional serrated adenoma, and the proportion of the adenocarcinoma component is approximately 50%. The tumor had invaded the lamina propria but confined to the mucosa. The resection margins were negative, and no lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion was seen. Abdominal pelvic computed tomography and positron emission tomography showed no other solid organ involvement or metastasis. Surveillance follow-up EGDs were done after 3 months and 1 year. There was no evidence of recurrence.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Xinxin Hu ◽  
Karina Aivazian ◽  
Catriona McKenzie ◽  
May Wong ◽  
Arthur Kaffes ◽  
...  

Introduction. Adenocarcinomas account for approximately 40% of small bowel cancers. They are typically mucosal lesions with distinctive features on endoscopy. We describe a rare case of duodenal adenocarcinoma presenting as a subepithelial lesion which posed a diagnostic challenge. Case. An 85-year-old male patient presented for investigation of iron deficiency anaemia. Initial upper endoscopy found a subepithelial duodenal lesion with central depression but otherwise normal appearing mucosa. Superficial biopsies of the duodenal lesion were unremarkable. Subsequent antegrade single balloon enteroscopy revealed active bleeding from the lesion which was refractory to endoscopic treatment. A complete local excision of the lesion via laparotomy was necessary to achieve haemostasis. Histopathology from the lesion showed a moderately differentiated duodenal adenocarcinoma with invasion into the submucosa but no evidence of lymphovascular spread. Conclusion. Duodenal adenocarcinomas are rare gastrointestinal tumours associated with a poor prognosis. This case report outlines a rare presentation of duodenal adenocarcinoma and highlights the importance of judicious assessment of lesions found on endoscopy. Advances in endoscopic diagnostic modalities could facilitate early diagnosis and improve therapeutic outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-646.e9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeongseok Kim ◽  
Ji Young Lee ◽  
Sung Wook Hwang ◽  
Sang Hyoung Park ◽  
Dong-Hoon Yang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document