scholarly journals Adaptive, but not condition-dependent, body shape differences contribute to assortative mating preferences during ecological speciation

Evolution ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (12) ◽  
pp. 2809-2822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Greenway ◽  
Shannon Drexler ◽  
Lenin Arias-Rodriguez ◽  
Michael Tobler
Hydrobiologia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 615 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Egger ◽  
Beate Obermüller ◽  
Eva Eigner ◽  
Christian Sturmbauer ◽  
Kristina M. Sefc

2012 ◽  
Vol 279 (1745) ◽  
pp. 4223-4229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie W. Smith ◽  
Stephanie M. Sjoberg ◽  
Matthew C. Mueller ◽  
Craig W. Benkman

How reproductive isolation is related to divergent natural selection is a central question in speciation. Here, we focus on several ecologically specialized taxa or ‘call types’ of red crossbills ( Loxia curvirostra complex), one of the few groups of birds providing much evidence for ecological speciation. Call types differ in bill sizes and feeding capabilities, and also differ in vocalizations, such that contact calls provide information on crossbill phenotype. We found that two call types of red crossbills were more likely to approach playbacks of their own call type than those of heterotypics, and that their propensity to approach heterotypics decreased with increasing divergence in bill size. Although call similarity also decreased with increasing divergence in bill size, comparisons of responses to familiar versus unfamiliar call types indicate that the decrease in the propensity to approach heterotypics with increasing divergence in bill size was a learned response, and not a by-product of calls diverging pleiotropically as bill size diverged. Because crossbills choose mates while in flocks, assortative flocking could lead indirectly to assortative mating as a by-product. These patterns of association therefore provide a mechanism by which increasing divergent selection can lead to increasing reproductive isolation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 278 (1718) ◽  
pp. 2604-2610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genevieve M. Kozak ◽  
Megan L. Head ◽  
Janette W. Boughman

During sexual imprinting, offspring learn parental phenotypes and then select mates who are similar to their parents. Imprinting has been thought to contribute to the process of speciation in only a few rare cases; this is despite imprinting's potential to generate assortative mating and solve the problem of recombination in ecological speciation. If offspring imprint on parental traits under divergent selection, these traits will then be involved in both adaptation and mate preference. Such ‘magic traits’ easily generate sexual isolation and facilitate speciation. In this study, we show that imprinting occurs in two ecologically divergent stickleback species (benthics and limnetics: Gasterosteus spp.). Cross-fostered females preferred mates of their foster father's species. Furthermore, imprinting is essential for sexual isolation between species; isolation was reduced when females were raised without fathers. Daughters imprinted on father odour and colour during a critical period early in development. These traits have diverged between the species owing to differences in ecology. Therefore, we provide the first evidence that imprinting links ecological adaptation to sexual isolation between species. Our results suggest that imprinting may facilitate the evolution of sexual isolation during ecological speciation, may be especially important in cases of rapid diversification, and thus play an integral role in the generation of biodiversity.


Evolution ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1660-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria C. Melo ◽  
Camilo Salazar ◽  
Chris D. Jiggins ◽  
Mauricio Linares

Evolution ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spencer J. Ingley ◽  
Gil G. Rosenthal

Author(s):  
Bernd Egger ◽  
Beate Obermüller ◽  
Eva Eigner ◽  
Christian Sturmbauer ◽  
Kristina M. Sefc

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Podos ◽  
Rie Dybboe ◽  
Mads Ole Jensen

Abstract Many recent studies of ecological speciation have focused on “magic trait” scenarios, in which divergent selection on viability traits leads inextricably to corresponding divergence in mechanisms, especially mate recognition systems, that facilitate assortative mating. Speciation however may also proceed via other scenarios, such as when populations experience directly selected or random divergence in mate recognition systems. The relative contributions of magic trait versus other scenarios for speciation remain virtually unexplored. The present study aims to test the relative contribution of the magic trait scenario in the divergence of populations of the medium ground finch Geospiza fortis of Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. First, we assess differences in G. fortis song between a northern population (Borrero Bay) and a southeastern population (El Garrapatero), differences that we propose (along with other within-island geographic song variations) have arisen via scenarios that do not involve a magic trait scenario. Pairwise comparisons of raw and composite (PC) song parameters, as well as discriminant functions analyses, reveal significant patterns of song divergence between sites. Second, we test the ability of territorial males at Borrero Bay to discriminate songs from the two sites. We find that G. fortis males can discriminate within-island song variants, responding more strongly to local than to “foreign” songs, along 3 raw and 1 composite response measures. Third, we compare these findings to prior data sets on song divergence and discrimination in Santa Cruz G. fortis. These comparisons suggest that song divergence and discrimination are shaped less strongly by geographic sources than by morphological (beak-related) sources. We thus argue that interpopulation song divergence and discrimination, fundamental elements of assortative mating in Darwin’s finches, can be fostered in early stages of divergence under magic trait as well as alternative scenarios for speciation, but with more emphasis on the magic trait scenario, at least for this species on this island.


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. S. Wright ◽  
N. Demandt ◽  
J. T. Alkema ◽  
O. Seehausen ◽  
T. G. G. Groothuis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document