Bilateral juvenile temporal arteritis mimicking clinical features of classic giant cell arteritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hind Al‐Busani ◽  
Takeshi Namiki ◽  
Shown Tokoro ◽  
Tsukasa Ugajin ◽  
Keiko Miura ◽  
...  
1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (17) ◽  
pp. 65-68

Polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell (cranial/temporal) arteritis are common debilitating conditions affecting people nearly always over the age of 55. Although the two syndromes are closely linked their precise relationship is not fully understood. Polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis can occur in a ‘pure’ form or clinical features of each may be present in the same patient. Treatment with a systemic corticosteroid has long been considered mandatory in patients with giant cell arteritis in order to prevent serious vascular complications, particularly blindness1. Treatment with corticosteroid is also usual for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. Many patients remain on steroids for years. What is the basis for current approaches to management? How should steroids be given and eventually stopped?


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-154
Author(s):  
Vasilica Cristescu ◽  
Aurelia Romila ◽  
Luana Andreea Macovei

Polymyalgia rheumatica is a disease that occurs mostly in the elderly and is rarely seen in patients less than 50 years of age. Polymyalgia rheumatica is a vasculitis, which manifests itself as an inflammatory disease of the vascular wall that can affect any type of blood vessel, regardless of its size. It has been considered a form of giant cell arteritis, involving primarily large and medium arteries and to a lesser extent the arterioles. Clinical manifestations are caused by the generic pathogenic process and depend on the characteristics of the damaged organ. PMR is a senescence-related immune disorder. It has been defined as a stand-alone condition and a syndrome referred to as rheumatic polyarteritis with manifestations of giant cell arteritis (especially in cases of Horton�s disease and temporal arteritis) which are commonly associated with polymyalgia. The clinical presentation is clearly dominated by the painful girdle syndrome, with a feeling of general discomfort. Polymyalgia and temporal arteritis may coexist or be consecutive to each other in the same patient, as in most of our patients. The present study describes 3 cases of polymyalgia rheumatica, admitted to the Clinic of Rheumatology of Sf. Apostol Andrei Hospital, Galati. The cases were compared with the literature. Two clinical aspects (polymyalgia rheumatica and/or Horton�s disease) and the relationship between them were also considered. Polymyalgia rheumatica is currently thought to have a multifactorial etiology, in which the following factors play a role: genetic factors or hereditary predisposition (some individuals are more prone to this disease), immune factors and viral infections (triggers of the disease). Other risk factors of polymyalgia rheumatica include age over 50 years and the association with giant cell arteritis. The characteristic feature of the disease is girdle pain, with intense stiffness of at least one hour�s duration. Markers of inflammation, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein are almost always increased at the onset of the disease. Diseases that can mimic the clinical picture of polymyalgia rheumatica are neoplasia, infections, metabolic disorders of the bone and endocrine diseases.


1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (806) ◽  
pp. 985-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Rodriguez-Garcia ◽  
C. Montalban ◽  
A. Zapatero ◽  
J. Saban ◽  
L. Capote

Author(s):  
Jan Tore Gran

Polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis are distinct but overlapping inflammatory conditions of unknown aetiology. They almost exclusively affect people over 50 years of age, women more than men (ratio 2–3:1), and particularly those of Nordic heritage. Temporal arteritis is characterized by granulomatous inflammation that penetrates all layers of the wall of medium and (often) large muscular arteries, in particular the superficial temporal artery. Histological examination of tissues from patients with polymyalgia rheumatica shows nonspecific changes only. The term ‘giant cell arteritis’ is properly used only to describe patients with biopsy-proven arteritis....


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren A Barnett ◽  
Toby Helliwell ◽  
Kelvin P Jordan ◽  
James A Prior

Abstract Background The diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) remains challenging due to the varied number and type of clinical features (symptoms and comorbidities) that patients with GCA can present with. Prompt diagnosis is important, as if left undiagnosed and untreated, some patients may experience irreversible sight loss. Given the rarity of GCA and that many of the presenting clinical features may pertain to other, more prevalent illnesses in the typical age range for GCA, diagnostic delay is common. Such delay may increase the risk of GCA related complications. The aim of this study was to quantify the association between a diagnosis of GCA and the clinical features observed prior to diagnosis. Methods Patients with a coded record of GCA and aged 40 years or older at the time of diagnosis, were identified from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) between 1990 and 2017. CPRD is a large, national UK database of primary care records. Every GCA case was matched to 5 controls with no GCA diagnosis, by year of birth, gender and practice. Clinical features linked to GCA in previous research studies were identified in the patient’s primary care records at any time prior to GCA diagnosis. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine associations between clinical features and a subsequent diagnosis of GCA, adjusting for Body Mass Index, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Results 9,205 patients with GCA were included, the majority of which were female (70.9%). 15 clinical features were examined. For example, 53.3% of GCA cases had a recorded consultation for headache prior to diagnosis (38.4% within six months prior to diagnosis), compared to 9.9% of controls; 3.2% of cases had recorded jaw pain (0.3% within six months prior to diagnosis) compared to 0.5% of controls; 39.4% of cases had a diagnosis for hypertension prior to their diagnosis of GCA. GCA cases were more likely than controls to have recorded consultations for headache (adjusted OR 10.57; 95% CI: 9.93, 11.25), jaw pain (5.37; 4.47, 6.44) and hypertension (1.33; 1.26, 1.40). Other clinical features that were statistically significantly associated with GCA included fever, anxiety/depression, and PMR. Cancer was the only clinical feature not associated with GCA. Conclusion Symptoms such as headache, jaw pain and hypertension are highly prevalent in GCA, but are also common symptoms in the usual age group affected by GCA and common features of many conditions. In isolation and considering the rarity of GCA in the UK population, these symptoms may not be immediately attributed to GCA by the diagnosing GP. It is therefore necessary to conduct further research where clinical features are not treated independently, but as groups or clusters, which together may more accurately help clinicians to diagnose GCA early. Disclosures L.A. Barnett None. T. Helliwell None. K.P. Jordan None. J.A. Prior None.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document