scholarly journals A review of applicant faking in selection interviews

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus G. Melchers ◽  
Nicolas Roulin ◽  
Anne‐Kathrin Buehl
Keyword(s):  
Applicant Faking ◽  
Selection Interviews

Applicant faking behavior: Prevalence, consequences, and remedies

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Griffith
Keyword(s):  
Applicant Faking

Applicant faking behavior and hiring decisions involving multiple predictors

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitchell H. Peterson ◽  
Richard L. Griffith
Keyword(s):  
Hiring Decisions ◽  
Applicant Faking

Examining old problems with new tools: Statistically modeling applicant faking

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Griffith ◽  
Tina Malm ◽  
Michael J. Zickar
Keyword(s):  
Applicant Faking

Deceptively Simple: Applicant Faking Behavior and Prediction of Job Performance

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Griffith ◽  
Yukiko Yoshita ◽  
Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Job Performance ◽  
Applicant Faking

A Closer Look at Applicant Faking Behavior

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Griffith ◽  
Neil D. Christiansen ◽  
Robert T. Hogan ◽  
Andrea F. Snell ◽  
Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Applicant Faking

Impact of Similarity of Interviewer-Interviewee and Interviewer-Interviewer on Ratings in a Selection Interview

1980 ◽  
Vol 47 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine F. Shepard ◽  
Maureen Hallinan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Social Approval ◽  
Background Characteristics ◽  
Selection Interview ◽  
Ideal Candidate ◽  
Selection Interviews ◽  
Actual Selection

This study aimed to determine whether similarity of interviewer and interviewee or interviewer and interviewer influenced applicant interview ratings. Data on background characteristics, relative interests and need for social approval were secured from 21 faculty interviewers and 296 applicants during actual selection interviews. Contrary to prior findings based on simulated activity, the results did not uphold the role of similarity. Additional data gathered from follow-up interviews with faculty interviewers point to preconceived conceptions of an “ideal” candidate as a stronger reference point for decision making in selection interviews than similarity to self.

Retest effects in medical selection interviews

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Griffin ◽  
Piers Bayl-Smith ◽  
Robbert Duvivier ◽  
Boaz Shulruf ◽  
Wendy Hu
Keyword(s):  
Selection Interviews ◽  
Medical Selection

Number and gender in selection interviews: Effects on outcomes, and candidates' views

1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 24-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Clark
Keyword(s):  
Selection Interviews ◽  
And Gender

Candidates' Beliefs and Self‐Presentation Strategies in Selection Interviews

1981 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Self Presentation ◽  
Selection Interviews

Intercultural Communication in Selection Interviews

2015 ◽  
pp. 23-52
Author(s):  
Choon-Hwa Lim ◽  
Meena Chavan ◽  
Lucy Taksa
Keyword(s):  
Intercultural Communication ◽  
Selection Interviews
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document