scholarly journals Dose modification for haematological toxicity: a survey of Australian medical oncologists

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 1338-1343
Author(s):  
Wanyuan Cui ◽  
Julia Shingleton ◽  
Liesel Byrne ◽  
Aisling Kelly ◽  
Lisa King ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (28) ◽  
pp. 2998-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aida Raigon-Ponferrada ◽  
María E.D. Recio ◽  
Jose L. Guerrero-Orriach ◽  
Alfredo Malo-Manso ◽  
Juan J. Escalona-Belmonte ◽  
...  

: Breast cancer is a complex heterogeneous disease that is categorized into several histological and genomic subtypes with relevant prognostic and therapeutical implications. Such diversity requires a multidisciplinary approach for a comprehensive treatment that will involve surgeons, radiotherapists and medical oncologists. Breast cancer is classified as either local (or locoregional), which stands for 90-95% of cases, or metastatic, representing 5% of cases. : The management of breast cancer will be determined by the stage of the disease. The treatment of local breast cancer is based on surgery and/or radiotherapy. Systemic breast cancer requires chemotherapy and/or endocrine and/or biological therapy.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richa Vatsa ◽  
Sunesh Kumar ◽  
Lalit Kumar

Introduction: Efforts are going on for development of new drugs for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We assessed safety profile of bevacizumab, a VEGF receptor blocking antibody in treatment of EOC. Methods: We assigned women with EOC to carboplatin (area under curve, 5 or 6) and paclitaxel (175 mg/square meter of body-surface area), given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, or to this regimen plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kilogram body weight), given concurrently every 3 weeks for 5 or 6 cycles and continued for 30 additional cycles. Primary outcome measures was safety profile of bevacizumab and secondary outcome was to see progression free survival (PFS). Results: Out of 30 patients, 10 were in Bevacizuma arm (Arm A) and 20 in conventional chemotherapy arm (Arm B). Haematological toxicity, GI perforation and proteinuria was similar in both. Other toxicities e.g. bleeding complication (p = 0.002) and hypertension (p = 0.04) was more in Arm A. PFS was similar in both arms; 24 months in Arm A and 22 months in Arm B (p = 0.565). 4 (40%) patients in arm A discontinued treatment, two (20%) because of disease progression after PFS of 9 and 6 months, two because of development of toxicity considered to be due to bevacizumab; of which one developed jejenal perforation and disease progression after PFS of 6 months and 1 because of development of persistent proteinuria of grade 3 after 18 months. Conclusion: Bevacizumab therapy does not improve PFS in EOC but increases toxicity spectrum of chemotherapy.


ESMO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 100053
Author(s):  
R. Berardi ◽  
M. Torniai ◽  
M.S. Cona ◽  
F.L. Cecere ◽  
R. Chiari ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-154
Author(s):  
M.J. Goodrick ◽  
F. Daniel ◽  
A.G. Prentice ◽  
J.A. Copplestone ◽  
C.J. Tyrrell

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1058.e2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Jung Kim ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Ji Chan Park ◽  
Gary Chisholm ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 550-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Homayounfar ◽  
A. Bleckmann ◽  
H.-J. Helms ◽  
F. Lordick ◽  
J. Rüschoff ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patty M. M. Nooijen ◽  
Felix Carvalho ◽  
Robert J. Flanagan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document