Effect of an anaesthesia department led critical care outreach and acute pain service on postoperative serious adverse events

Anaesthesia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Story ◽  
A. C. Shelton ◽  
S. J. Poustie ◽  
N. J. Colin-Thome ◽  
R. E. McIntyre ◽  
...  
Anaesthesia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 762-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Story ◽  
A. C. Shelton ◽  
S. J. Poustie ◽  
N. J. Colin-Thome ◽  
P. L. McNicol

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carine Prinsloo

The deterioration of patients in general wards could go unnoticed owing to the intermittent monitoring of vital data. The delayed or missed recognition of deteriorating patients results in serious adverse events in general wards. These challenges have resulted in the development of a critical care outreach service. Australia was the first country to establish critical care outreach services in 1990. In South Africa, critical care outreach services were implemented in 2005 at a private hospital in Pretoria. The researcher has noticed certain phenomena supported by literature such as the hesitancy of nurses working in general wards to escalate a patient to a critical care outreach service, and incorrect interpretation of modified early warning scores which could cause delays in patients being referred to outreach nurse experts. In this study, nurses’ (professional, staff and auxiliary nurses) experiences in respect of their self-leadership in critical care outreach services were explored. To this end, a qualitative phenomenological research approach was followed. Focus groups were held with the nurses (all nurse categories) working in a South African private hospital which provides critical care outreach services. It is recommended that nurses be granted access to training sessions, workshops and information to provide appropriate nursing care. Nurses should be encouraged to focus on the positive outcomes of providing nursing care and to “applaud themselves mentally” when they have successfully assisted or cared for their patients. Nurses also need to identify and correct negative assumptions about their competence.


Anaesthesia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-418
Author(s):  
G. A. R. Morgan ◽  
P. G. Lawler

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 217-217
Author(s):  
S. Van der Elst ◽  
A. Steyaert ◽  
J. -L. Scholtès ◽  
M. -N. France ◽  
P. Lavandʼhomme

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 228-236
Author(s):  
Cormac Mullins ◽  
Lauren O’Loughlin ◽  
Ulrich Albus ◽  
JR Skelly ◽  
Jeremy Smith

In certain hospitals, epidural analgesia is restricted to critical care beds. Due to critical care bed strain, it is likely that many patients are unable to avail of epidural analgesia. The aims of the study were to retrospectively review the number of patients admitted to critical care beds for epidural analgesia over a two-year period 2015–16, to determine the duration of epidural analgesia, to identify the average critical care bed occupancy during this period, to get updated information on the implementation of acute pain service in the Republic of Ireland and the availability of ward-based epidural analgesia. One hundred and sixty patients had a midline laparotomy, 40 of which had an epidural (25%). Forty-two patients were admitted to a critical care bed for epidural analgesia. Aside from epidural analgesia, 12% had other indications for ICU admission. Median duration epidural analgesia was 1.64 days (IQR 0.98–2.14 days). ICU bed occupancy rates were 88.7% in 2015 and 85.1% in 2016. Acute pain service and ward-based epidural analgesia were available in 46 and 42% of hospitals, respectively. Restricting epidural use to a critical care setting is likely to result in reduced access to epidural analgesia. The implementation of acute pain service and availability of ward-based epidural analgesia in the Republic of Ireland are suboptimal.


Critical Care ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pashtoon M Kasi ◽  
Hussein A Tawbi ◽  
Chester V Oddis ◽  
Hrishikesh S Kulkarni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document