Managing epidural catheters in critical care beds: An observation analysis in the Republic of Ireland

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 228-236
Author(s):  
Cormac Mullins ◽  
Lauren O’Loughlin ◽  
Ulrich Albus ◽  
JR Skelly ◽  
Jeremy Smith
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Acute Pain Service ◽  
Bed Occupancy ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Republic Of Ireland ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Epidural Catheters

In certain hospitals, epidural analgesia is restricted to critical care beds. Due to critical care bed strain, it is likely that many patients are unable to avail of epidural analgesia. The aims of the study were to retrospectively review the number of patients admitted to critical care beds for epidural analgesia over a two-year period 2015–16, to determine the duration of epidural analgesia, to identify the average critical care bed occupancy during this period, to get updated information on the implementation of acute pain service in the Republic of Ireland and the availability of ward-based epidural analgesia. One hundred and sixty patients had a midline laparotomy, 40 of which had an epidural (25%). Forty-two patients were admitted to a critical care bed for epidural analgesia. Aside from epidural analgesia, 12% had other indications for ICU admission. Median duration epidural analgesia was 1.64 days (IQR 0.98–2.14 days). ICU bed occupancy rates were 88.7% in 2015 and 85.1% in 2016. Acute pain service and ward-based epidural analgesia were available in 46 and 42% of hospitals, respectively. Restricting epidural use to a critical care setting is likely to result in reduced access to epidural analgesia. The implementation of acute pain service and availability of ward-based epidural analgesia in the Republic of Ireland are suboptimal.

scholarly journals Epidural Analgesia: Prospective Audit of 1062 Patients

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Burstal ◽  
F. Wegener ◽  
C. Hayes ◽  
G. Lantry
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Respiratory Depression ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Epidural Abscess ◽  
Prospective Audit ◽  
Prospective Survey ◽  
Skin Site ◽  
Epidural Catheters ◽  
Regular Review

A prospective survey of one thousand and sixty-two patients receiving epidural analgesia in surgical wards was undertaken over a two-year period. The duration of infusion ranged from one to fourteen days, with a mode of three days. There were 1131 episodes where a local anaesthetic and opioid mixture was used and 160 where opioids were used alone. Local anaesthetic was not used without opioids. 23% of catheters were removed prematurely because of catheter related problems including accidental dislodgement (13%) and skin site inflammation (5.3%). No epidural abscess or haematoma was identified. In 14% of the total number of episodes there was either no demonstrable block or complications occurred requiring a change of solution: 30% of this group were salvaged following intervention by the Acute Pain Service (APS). The incidence of respiratory depression was 0.24%. There was no case of delayed respiratory depression. Epidural analgesia can be used safely in surgical wards provided that regular review of the patients is undertaken. It must be anticipated however, that up to 20% of patients will not receive adequate analgesia for the first 48 hours postoperatively. The failure rate could be halved if accidental dislodgement of epidural catheters could be eliminated.

scholarly journals The acute pain service, a model for outreach critical care

Anaesthesia ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-418
Author(s):  
G. A. R. Morgan ◽  
P. G. Lawler
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Acute Pain ◽  
Acute Pain Service

scholarly journals Predictions of COVID-19 dynamics in the UK: Short-term forecasting and analysis of potential exit strategies

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e1008619
Author(s):  
Matt J. Keeling ◽  
Edward M. Hill ◽  
Erin E. Gorsich ◽  
Bridget Penman ◽  
Glen Guyver-Fletcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Transmission Model ◽  
Bed Occupancy ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Social Distancing ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Efforts to suppress transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK have seen non-pharmaceutical interventions being invoked. The most severe measures to date include all restaurants, pubs and cafes being ordered to close on 20th March, followed by a “stay at home” order on the 23rd March and the closure of all non-essential retail outlets for an indefinite period. Government agencies are presently analysing how best to develop an exit strategy from these measures and to determine how the epidemic may progress once measures are lifted. Mathematical models are currently providing short and long term forecasts regarding the future course of the COVID-19 outbreak in the UK to support evidence-based policymaking. We present a deterministic, age-structured transmission model that uses real-time data on confirmed cases requiring hospital care and mortality to provide up-to-date predictions on epidemic spread in ten regions of the UK. The model captures a range of age-dependent heterogeneities, reduced transmission from asymptomatic infections and produces a good fit to the key epidemic features over time. We simulated a suite of scenarios to assess the impact of differing approaches to relaxing social distancing measures from 7th May 2020 on the estimated number of patients requiring inpatient and critical care treatment, and deaths. With regard to future epidemic outcomes, we investigated the impact of reducing compliance, ongoing shielding of elder age groups, reapplying stringent social distancing measures using region based triggers and the role of asymptomatic transmission. We find that significant relaxation of social distancing measures from 7th May onwards can lead to a rapid resurgence of COVID-19 disease and the health system being quickly overwhelmed by a sizeable, second epidemic wave. In all considered age-shielding based strategies, we projected serious demand on critical care resources during the course of the pandemic. The reintroduction and release of strict measures on a regional basis, based on ICU bed occupancy, results in a long epidemic tail, until the second half of 2021, but ensures that the health service is protected by reintroducing social distancing measures for all individuals in a region when required. Our work confirms the effectiveness of stringent non-pharmaceutical measures in March 2020 to suppress the epidemic. It also provides strong evidence to support the need for a cautious, measured approach to relaxation of lockdown measures, to protect the most vulnerable members of society and support the health service through subduing demand on hospital beds, in particular bed occupancy in intensive care units.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document