scholarly journals The outcomes of partnerships with mental health service users in interprofessional education: a case study

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 426-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Barnes ◽  
John Carpenter ◽  
Claire Dickinson
2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (8) ◽  
pp. 977-987
Author(s):  
Mark Dalgarno ◽  
Jennifer Oates

Objectives: This study explored healthcare professionals’ accounts of being practitioner trainers in a mental health Recovery College, where they worked with peer trainers, who were people with lived experience of mental illness, to co-produce workshops for mental health service users and staff. The aim of this study was to understand the process of co-production in the Recovery College from the perspective of practitioner trainers. Design: Single-site case study. Setting: A Recovery College in the South of England, open to staff and service users from one mental health care provider organisation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with eight mental healthcare professionals. Transcripts were thematically analysed. Results: A central image of ‘the workshop as crucible’ emerged from the three themes derived from the analysis. Co-facilitating the workshop was a ‘structured’ encounter, within which health professionals experienced ‘dynamism’ and change. For them, this involved experiences of ‘challenge and discomfort’. Conclusion: Findings from this study contribute to the evidence base for the evaluation of Recovery Colleges by focusing on the training impact on staff. Findings suggest that taking on a trainer role in Recovery College co-production is beneficial for healthcare professionals as well as mental health service users, especially if healthcare professionals are open to the dynamism and possible discomfort of these workshop encounters. Future research, however, should expand beyond single-site case studies to test the extent to which this metaphor and themes are appropriate to describing the ‘transformative’ element of co-production.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Satinsky ◽  
Corine Driessens ◽  
David Crepaz-Keay ◽  
Antonis A. Kousoulis

BackgroundTo improve health services, social, economic and health data should be shared and linked to create a full narrative of lived experience. Mental health data sharing is often considered a particularly sensitive area.ObjectiveTo assess mental health service users’ perceptions regarding the current practice of administrative data-driven research.MethodWe conducted a focus group using case study scenarios. Themes and subthemes were analysed using qualitative methods.ResultsParticipants were generally happy for data owners to share their health, social and economic data if the purpose was transparent and if the information would inform and improve health policy and practice. Participants were less keen on sharing data through digital applications.ConclusionThis case study informs a data linkage study protocol. Research teams and database owners should strive to educate service users on data protection and create dissent opportunities.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Garcia-Cubillana de la Cruz ◽  
Aguila bono del Trigo ◽  
Vicente Ibanez Rojo ◽  
Evelyn Huizing

2021 ◽  
pp. 100059
Author(s):  
Julie Dare ◽  
Helen Seiver ◽  
Lesley Andrew ◽  
David Coall ◽  
Shantha Karthigesu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110286
Author(s):  
Russ Scott ◽  
Andrew Aboud

Objective: Consider whether mental health service users and carers meaningfully engage in care planning and whether care planning adds value to patient care. Conclusion: A review of the meta-analyses and systematic reviews of service users and carers identified many barriers to their meaningful engagement in care planning. No research has demonstrated any measurable benefits or positive outcomes linked to mental health care planning.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
David Lees ◽  
Nicholas Procter ◽  
Denise Fassett ◽  
Christine Handley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document