scholarly journals Assessing the usability of methods of public reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK Yellow Card Scheme

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 433-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Anderson ◽  
Alison Gifford ◽  
Anthony Avery ◽  
Heather Fortnum ◽  
Elizabeth Murphy ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. A57-A57
Author(s):  
D. B. Hawcutt ◽  
P. Mainie ◽  
R. Appleton ◽  
R. Smyth ◽  
M. Pirmohamed

Author(s):  
Robert C. Bracchi ◽  
Foteini Tseliou ◽  
Lauren Copeland ◽  
Philip A. Routledge ◽  
Alison Thomas ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Crombie

The number of cases of an adverse reaction which could be seen by individual doctors was investigated taking realistic values for the frequency of drug prescribing and a range of frequencies of adverse drug reactions. The results indicated that, for almost all drugs, general practitioners (GPs) will seldom see other than single cases of an adverse reaction. It is argued that doctors will be unlikely to recognize an adverse reaction from a single case (unless it presented with some striking clinical features) so that potential new adverse reactions will rarely be reported by GPs under the Yellow Card scheme. A similar analysis for hospital doctors indicated that clinicians working in some specialities, may have a greater chance of seeing more than one case of an adverse reaction. A review of the identification of several important adverse reactions revealed that all the reports from British doctors were submitted by clinicians with hospital appointments. This study suggests that the major part of the operation of the Yellow Card system will contribute little to the identification of adverse reactions and that its organization and activities need to be reassessed. A modified system designed to encourage reporting by hospital clinicians could be of greater value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. e36.1-e36
Author(s):  
C King ◽  
N Bhoombla ◽  
J Clarke ◽  
V Morgan ◽  
J Preston ◽  
...  

BackgroundUK patients of all ages can contribute to the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) Yellow Card scheme (YCS), reporting suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Children’s and young people’s (CYPs) contribution to, and awareness of, the YCS is not known.MethodsSuspected ADR reports received by the MHRA from 01/01/2008 to 29/11/2018 were examined. Prospective data from CYP and parents in paediatric outpatients were collected as part of the QUestionnaire study about Adverse Drug ReAcTions In Children (QUADRATIC) study (IRAS 242352).ResultsCYP contributed 2.3% of YCS reports for patients < 19 years. Patients from age 10 years old have contributed YCS reports, and CYP reports are increasing annually. Reports from CYP contain different suspected medications and reactions compared to YCS for all patients age < 19 years. Common CYP generated reports prioritiseadolescent vaccinations (Human papilloma virus most reported, n=69), oral contraceptives, acne medication, anti-infectives, and antidepressants.Common CYP generated reports identified depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation, which were not amongst common reports about CYP. Amongst CYP (n=50) attending outpatients, the YCS was not known to any CYP. The YCS was known to 16.3% of parents (8/49) interviewed. From this population of patients with a chronic illness, with high rates of drug therapy, 68 suspected ADRs were identified overall.ConclusionCYP contribute to YCS, with distinct patterns of suspected medications and reactions. Awareness of the YCS appears poor, particularly in populations you would expect to have a greater level of knowledge and understanding about medicines.Disclosure(s)Nothing to disclose


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document