Generalized allergic reactions during skin testing

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantinos Pitsios
1990 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. 1634-1639 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.J.J. Vreeburg ◽  
I.M.W. Van Hoogstraten ◽  
B.M.E. Von Blomberg ◽  
K. De Groot ◽  
R.J. Scheper

Metal alloys used in dentistry may elicit adverse side-effects. Contact allergic reactions to metals released from such alloys are among the most frequently encountered problems. In an earlier study, we observed that oral contacts with nickel or chromium salts did not sensitize, but rather decreased the risk of subsequent sensitization to these metals. In the present study, we focused on chromium allergy and extended our earlier observations by further dose-response studies. In addition, we compared different chromium valencies as to their potential oral tolerogenic effects. Development of immunological tolerance in chromium-fed guinea pigs was demonstrated by their inability to develop chromium hypersensitivity after a subsequent immunization attempt. For these studies, the techniques of immunization and skin testing were first improved. One feeding with a high dose of K2Cr2O7, (containing hexavalent chromium) was effective in full tolerance induction. In contrast, trivalent chromium (CrCl3) induced a distinctly lower degree of tolerance, whereas metallic chromium powder was not detectably tolerogenic after a limited number of feedings. Dose-frequency-response studies with K2Cr2O 7, showed that full tolerance could also be induced by an increase in the number of feedings with sub-optimal tolerogenic doses. The present results therefore support our hypothesis that long-lasting oral contact with chromium-releasing metal alloys may ultimately result in strong immune tolerance to this metal in subjects without previous skin contact with it. This view is further supported by recent insights into the unique tolerogenicity of oral, as compared with gastro-intestinal, allergenic contacts.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 595-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Régis Fuzier ◽  
Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre ◽  
Paul-Michel Mertes ◽  
Jean-François Nicolas ◽  
Yves Benoit ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 215265671876413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy I. Joseph ◽  
Eileen Slavin ◽  
Brian P. Peppers ◽  
Robert W. Hostoffer

Fenugreek ( Trigonella foenum-graecum) is a food product that belongs to the Leguminosae family along with other legumes. It has been used in India, Greece, and Egypt for culinary and medical purposes since ancient times, and today, fenugreek is used for flavoring foods, dyes, and drugs throughout the world. Many members of the Leguminosae family have been associated with allergies including soybean, green pea, and peanut. Fenugreek is also included in this family and may result in allergic reactions. Two cases of anaphylaxis have been described in children after ingestion of curry and pastes that contain fenugreek, although the true nature of the causative agent was unclear. We report the first case of fenugreek anaphylaxis in a pediatric patient defined by skin testing, immunoglobulin E ImmunoCAP assays, and clear ingestion.


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
PR Regmi ◽  
AB Upadhyaya

Background Rheumatic Fever (RF) causes 25-40% of all cardio vascular disease in developing countries. Long term benzathine penicillin injection is being used for secondary prophylaxis of RF / RHD. Although allergic reaction to penicillin is rare skin testing is performed routinely before each and every penicillin injection delivery in most of the hospitals in Nepal. Objectives Objectives of this study was to evaluate safety of long term benzathine penicillin injection and establish recommendations for penicillin skin testing. Methods Data from the registers of National RF/RHD prevention and control programme from 32 hospitals of Nepal were collected and analyzed in a retrospective study. Results 65 patients (1.4%) among 77300 injections of benzathine penicillin given to 4712 patients, had allergic reactions. 5 had anaphylaxis, an incidence of 0.1% (0.7/10000 injections), 60 had minor allergy, an incidence of 1.3%. Conclusions Life-threatening allergic reactions are very rare in patients on long-term intramuscular benzathine penicillin for secondary prevention of RF. With these rare complications, regular skin test before each and every benzathine penicillin injection delivery has no significant role. Nevertheless Skin testing is recommended before 1st injection and patients having different batch number and or brand name. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njh.v8i1.8331 Nepalese Heart Journal Vol.8(1) 2011 pp.16-18


Author(s):  
Anna R. Wolfson ◽  
Lacey B. Robinson ◽  
Lily Li ◽  
Aubree E. McMahon ◽  
Amelia S. Cogan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Thi Vu ◽  
Anh Quynh Nguyen ◽  
Bo Duy Nguyen ◽  
Huong Thu Duong ◽  
Quyet Van Nguyen ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 851-857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven T Eggleston ◽  
Lori W Lush

OBJECTIVE: To review the pharmacology and mechanisms by which local anesthetics cause allergic reactions. Recommendations concerning appropriate use of local anesthetics and alternative therapies in patients with documented local anesthetic allergies are given. DATA SOURCE: A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature identified pertinent clinical studies, case reports, and reviews. The periods of review were Med1, 1990-present; and Med2, 1985-1989, using the MeSH terms drug hypersensitivity and anesthetics. References from the selected studies, case reports, and reviews were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: Controlled and uncontrolled prospective studies and case reports pertaining to local anesthetic allergies were reviewed. The selection focused on information pertaining to the etiology and diagnosis of allergic reactions to local anesthetics and alternative therapies for patients with local anesthetic allergies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Local anesthetics are classified as either ester or amide compounds. Esters are associated with a higher incidence of allergic reactions, due to a p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) metabolite. Amide agents do not undergo such metabolism. However, preservative compounds (methylparaben) used in the preparation of amide-type agents are metabolized to PABA. Patients who are allergic to ester local anesthetics should be treated with a preservative-free amide local anesthetic. If the patient is not allergic to ester local anesthetics, these agents may be used in amide-sensitive patients. In the rare instance that hypersensitivity to both ester and amide local anesthetics occurs, or if skin testing cannot be performed, then alternative therapies including diphenhydramine, opioids, general analgesia, or hypnosis can be used. CONCLUSIONS: A true immunologic reaction to a local anesthetic is rare. Intradermal skin testing of local anesthetic compounds, methylparaben, and metabisulfite should be performed in patients when a thorough history does not rule out a possible allergic reaction to local anesthetics and future local anesthesia is necessary. Skin testing enables the clinician to identify autonomic responses to minor surgical procedures and toxic reactions to anesthetics so that patients are not incorrectly labeled as “caine” allergic. Diphenhydramine can be used as an alternative to ester and amide local anesthetics in minor procedures of short duration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document