scholarly journals Dose–response relationship for inhaled corticosteroids and the add-on effect of long-acting β2-adrenergic receptor agonists in adult chronic asthmatics

2004 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki. Hojo ◽  
Koichiro. Kudo
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 1901147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Maijers ◽  
Nethmi Kearns ◽  
James Harper ◽  
Mark Weatherall ◽  
Richard Beasley

BackgroundThe proportion of the efficacy of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma that is due to systemic effects is uncertain. This study aimed to estimate the ICS dose–response relationship for oral corticosteroid-sparing effects in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, and to determine the proportion of oral corticosteroid-sparing effects due to their systemic effects, based on the comparative dose–response relationship of ICS versus oral corticosteroids on adrenal suppression.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials reporting oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of high-dose ICS in oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. In addition, reports of oral corticosteroid to ICS dose-equivalence in terms of adrenal suppression were retrieved. The primary outcome was the proportion of the oral corticosteroid-sparing effect of ICS that could be attributed to systemic absorption, per 1000 µg increase of ICS, expressed as a ratio. This ratio estimates the oral corticosteroid sparing effect of ICS due to systemic effects.Results11 studies including 1283 participants reporting oral corticosteroid-sparing effects of ICS were identified. The prednisone dose decrease per 1000 µg increase in ICS varied from 2.1 mg to 4.9 mg, depending on the type of ICS. The ratio of the prednisone-sparing effect due to the systemic effects per 1000 µg of fluticasone propionate was 1.02 (95% CI 0.68–2.08) and for budesonide was 0.93 (95% CI 0.63–1.89).ConclusionIn patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma, the limited available evidence suggests that the majority of the oral corticosteroid-sparing effect of high-dose ICS is likely to be due to systemic effects.


2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1451-1458 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Weatherall ◽  
K. James ◽  
J. Clay ◽  
K. Perrin ◽  
M. Masoli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Beasley ◽  
James Harper ◽  
Grace Bird ◽  
Harriette Dunphy ◽  
Alex Semprini ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and objective The dose-response relationship of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/fast-onset long acting beta agonist (LABA) reliever therapy has not been formally addressed. The objective of this retrospective analysis is to ascertain from the available evidence whether ICS/fast-onset LABA administered as reliever therapy has a different dose-response relationship than maintenance fixed dose ICS/fast-onset LABA therapy in reducing risk of severe exacerbations. Methods A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which randomised treatments included either i) budesonide/formoterol reliever monotherapy versus budesonide/formoterol fixed dose maintenance with short acting beta agonist (SABA) reliever therapy, or ii) budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy in addition to budesonide/formoterol maintenance versus higher fixed dose maintenance budesonide/formoterol with SABA as reliever therapy. Eligible studies were reviewed to allow determination of the relative potency and efficacy of the comparator regimens to reduce the risk of a severe exacerbation. Results The one RCT of budesonide/formoterol reliever monotherapy showed a 4.6-fold (95% CI 2.9 to 7.3) greater potency than budesonide/formoterol fixed dose maintenance plus SABA reliever therapy in reducing the risk of severe exacerbations. In the one RCT that compared budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy with higher fixed dose maintenance budesonide/formoterol plus SABA reliever therapy, there was an additional 26% (95% CI 4 to 42%) reduction in severe exacerbation risk with the addition of budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy to maintenance budesonide/formoterol, despite a 25% lower total budesonide/formoterol dose. Conclusion The limited available evidence suggests that budesonide/formoterol reliever therapy has greater potency and efficacy than budesonide/formoterol fixed dose maintenance plus SABA reliever therapy in reducing the risk of a severe exacerbation. This is an important concept which has the potential to guide clinical practice in asthma, although the small number of studies available highlights the need for further research to better define these pharmacological properties.


2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (14) ◽  
pp. 4192-4201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panayiotis A. Procopiou ◽  
Victoria J. Barrett ◽  
Nicola J. Bevan ◽  
Peter R. Butchers ◽  
Richard Conroy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document