Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi

2011 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1913-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Koo ◽  
Michael Young ◽  
Trevor Thompson ◽  
Brian Duggan
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene B. Cone ◽  
Brian H. Eisner ◽  
Michal Ursiny ◽  
Gyan Pareek

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (3-4) ◽  
pp. E156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Beom Kim ◽  
Sang Cheol Lee ◽  
Khae Hawn Kim ◽  
Han Jung ◽  
Sang Jin Yoon ◽  
...  

Introduction: Recently, few studies were reported about the treatment of large, solitary, renal calculi between shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). We assess the feasibility of SWL for managing solitary, lower calyceal stones over 1 cm by comparing the results of lower pole calculi treatment between patients that underwent SWL or PNL.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data for patients who had undergone PNL or SWL due to lower calyceal stones over 1 cm. Group 1 consisted of patients who underwent SWL to treat lower pole renal calculi from 2010 to 2011. Group 2 included patients who underwent PNL to manage lower pole renal calculi from 2008 to 2009. We compared patient age, gender, stone size, comorbidities, postoperative complications, additional interventions and anatomical parameters between the two groups.Results: A total of 55 patients were enrolled in this study. The mean ages (±SD) of groups 1 (n = 33) and 2 (n = 22) were 55.1 (±13.0) and 50.0 (±10.6) years (p = 0.133) and mean stone sizes were 1.6 (±0.7) and 1.9 (±0.8) cm (p = 0.135), respectively. There were no significant differences in gender distribution, comorbidities or stone laterality between the two groups. No significant differences in various parameters were observed between patients with stones 1 to 2 cm and ones with stones 2 cm or larger.Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that SWL is a safe, feasible treatment for solitary, lower calyceal stones over 1 cm.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sahai ◽  
F Khan ◽  
F Anjum ◽  
IK Dickinson ◽  
H Marsh ◽  
...  

Objective: Our aim was to determine whether flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy is efficacious and safe in treating lower pole renal calculi. Materials and methods: Patient, procedure and stone data of patients who underwent flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy at our referral centre were collected prospectively between November 2005 and November 2011 and entered into a designated database. In all, 242 procedures were performed in 198 patients. Results: The mean age was 51.2 years. The mean calculi size was 10.51 mm (range 4–27 mm). Thirty seven patients had more than one stone in the lower pole. An access sheath was used in 19 patients (9.6%), 171 (86.4%) had a ureteric stent inserted after the procedure, and 165 patients had a single procedure. Re-operation rate was 16.7%. Stone-free rates after one procedure were 89%, 80% and 41%, respectively, for calculi measuring 4–10 mm ( n=107), 11–20 mm ( n=76) and > 20 mm ( n=15). The overall stone-free rate was 83%, 91% and 95% after one, two and three procedures, respectively. Conclusion: Flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy is a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment option for patients with 4–20 mm lower pole calculi. Staged procedures, however, become necessary as the size of the stone increases greater than 20 mm, and this should be mentioned when counselling patients for their primary procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document