SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY: QUANTIFYING THE COSTS

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
DANIEL D. HUPPERT
Keyword(s):  
2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 569-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
John R. McKean ◽  
Donn M. Johnson ◽  
R. Garth Taylor

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Gore ◽  
Patricia Doerr

For centuries, Pacific salmonids have been migrating up and down the Columbia and Snake Rivers. Unfortunately and for various reasons, most notably the erection of numerous dams along these rivers, the size of several populations of Pacific salmonids has dramatically decreased in the past several decades. Currently all five species of Snake River salmon are listed under the Endangered Species Act, and no holistic extinction prevention or recovery plan exists. This paper examines four policy alternatives to determine which would constitute the most comprehensive, holistic, and timely recovery plan for these endangered Snake River salmon. This recovery plan should not only prevent extinction of the listed salmon populations, but should eventually result in the delisting of these species. After a review of the four alternatives and an examination of the political climate surrounding this contentious issue, it is concluded that the four dams on the Lower Snake River must be breached. Further, certain elements from the aggressive nonbreach alternative should be implemented in conjunction with dam removal to ensure that each of the 4-H's (habitat, hatchery, harvest and hydropower) are addressed such that salmon are given a better chance at recovery.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles C. Harris ◽  
Erik A. Nielsen ◽  
William J. McLaughlin ◽  
Dennis R. Becker

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Lopardo ◽  
Clare M. Ryan

Four dams on the lower Snake River in Washington State generate hydropower and allow for regional agriculture and barge shipping to Portland OR. However, the dams impede the migration of local salmon populations (Oncorhynchus spp.), which are in steep decline, and drastically impact the populations of salmon and orca whales, for whom salmon are a primary food source. For years, environmental groups have argued for breaching the dams; other interests counter that the dams are too critical to the economy of the region to lose; and federal agencies assert that the dams can remain and salmon populations will recover with mitigation techniques. Scientific and economic analyses, litigation, and elected officials’ efforts have not been able to move the issue towards a solution. Readers will examine the interests of primary actors in the issue, how they influence the policy process, the role of scientific and economic analyses, and possible approaches for resolving the issue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document