Effects of monetary reward and punishment on stimulus-preceding negativity

2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimi Ohgami ◽  
Yasunori Kotani ◽  
Tetsuji Tsukamoto ◽  
Kazufumi Omura ◽  
Yusuke Inoue ◽  
...  
1974 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Cohen ◽  
Lars-Göran Nilsson

Subjects were given one study and two test trials on a list of paired associates. Critical responses on the first test were those which were rewarded or punished by gain or withdrawal of money. Between subjects variables were (a) whether the critical responses on test 1 were right or wrong, and (b) whether subjects were informed of the second test before or after test 1. On test 2, subjects were asked to repeat their test 1 responses to the appropriate stimuli. When subjects were unaware that they would receive a second test, rewarding a response on test 1 increased its probability of repetition on test 2; punishment had no significant effect. When subjects were aware that they would be tested again, the reward/ punishment treatment had no effect. An explanation based on the Law of Effect is rejected in favour of a cognitive explanation, utilizing the total time hypothesis.


2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (6) ◽  
pp. 3284-3293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juri Fujiwara ◽  
Philippe N. Tobler ◽  
Masato Taira ◽  
Toshio Iijima ◽  
Ken-Ichiro Tsutsui

Reward and punishment have opposite affective value but are both processed by the cingulate cortex. However, it is unclear whether the positive and negative affective values of monetary reward and punishment are processed by separate or common subregions of the cingulate cortex. We performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a free-choice task and compared cingulate activations for different levels of monetary gain and loss. Gain-specific activation (increasing activation for increasing gain, but no activation change in relation to loss) occurred mainly in the anterior part of the anterior cingulate and in the posterior cingulate cortex. Conversely, loss-specific activation (increasing activation for increasing loss, but no activation change in relation to gain) occurred between these areas, in the middle and posterior part of the anterior cingulate. Integrated coding of gain and loss (increasing activation throughout the full range, from biggest loss to biggest gain) occurred in the dorsal part of the anterior cingulate, at the border with the medial prefrontal cortex. Finally, unspecific activation increases to both gains and losses (increasing activation to increasing gains and increasing losses, possibly reflecting attention) occurred in dorsal and middle regions of the cingulate cortex. Together, these results suggest separate and common coding of monetary reward and punishment in distinct subregions of the cingulate cortex. Further meta-analysis suggested that the presently found reward- and punishment-specific areas overlapped with those processing positive and negative emotions, respectively.


2010 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. e69
Author(s):  
Yayoi Shigemune ◽  
Takashi Tsukiura ◽  
Toshimune Kambara ◽  
Ryuta Kawashima

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 1319-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Shigemune ◽  
T. Tsukiura ◽  
T. Kambara ◽  
R. Kawashima

2016 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 258-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Y.W. Li ◽  
Anna L. Cox ◽  
Calvin Or ◽  
Ann Blandford

2018 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 110-117
Author(s):  
Simon Y.W. Li ◽  
Anna L. Cox ◽  
Calvin Or ◽  
Ann Blandford

Author(s):  
Rupesh K. Chikara ◽  
Erik C. Chang ◽  
Yi-Chen Lu ◽  
Dar-Shong Lin ◽  
Chin-Teng Lin ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 942-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catharina S. van Meel ◽  
Dirk J. Heslenfeld ◽  
Jaap Oosterlaan ◽  
Marjolein Luman ◽  
Joseph A. Sergeant

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document